OT: French lady Interpreter gets "culturally-enriched" by "refugees"

But didn't they have American-sounding names ?>:-} ...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at

| 1962 |

I'll have you know that I have never once referred to anyone here as being a member of the ignorant, hateful, ugly, mooching class.

I have always been kind, referring to them by their own chosen name... Democrats O:-)

Where the f*ck is Slowman ? He should be here to tell us not to judge them all by the actions of a few and we should welcome them. And at the same tim e the actions of a few people with guns means 100 million or more of us sho uld give up ours.

Conservatives are liberals who have learned. Too bad we have so few. They a re practically extinct in many countries. Only their rich 0.01 % are conser vative and they only conserve what is theirs. Most of the time they have no problem being liberal with what comes from their subjects, who they have t otally fooled.

Here's what we've spent on Homeland Security in the past 15 years or so since 9/11:

The number of Americans killed by terrorist attacks on US soil since

9/11 has been IIRC around 120 - about the same number of Americans killed in automobile accidents in the past 24 hours.

Just to put things in perspective.

On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 4:48:09 AM UTC+11, snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote :

all by the actions of a few and we should welcome them.

Some of them. By the same token native-born creeps (and there are lots of t hem) should get discouraged equally enthusiastically.

ion or more of us should give up ours.

The argument for tighter gun controls is that of the 100 million people who own guns, some 2000 will use them this year to kill themselves. That's the most prominent effect of gun ownership. Some gun owners go out and shoot a few other people in the process of committing suicide, but that's statisti cally insignificant.

Some might be. Most conservatives seem to be incapable of learning anything , so can't ever have been liberals.

nly their rich 0.01 % are conservative and they only conserve what is their s. Most of the time they have no problem being liberal with what comes from their subjects, who they have totally fooled.

In the US the proportion is closer to 1%.

most_Always_Do_Better

as with all real situations, the boundaries aren't sharp-edged.

There are a lot of conservatives in the 99% - bad education and misleading media mean that a lot of the less well-off vote for policies that don't do them any good at all.

Your own depressing ignorance makes it difficult for you to see Trump as th e posturing buffoon that he really is, and leads you to discount the danger of letting him anywhere near the levers of power.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

I'm glad we don't apply the same logic to immunisation.....

...and add in that the number killed in our hospitals; a LOT more.

Infectious diseases killed a lot of people before we went in for wholesale immunisation - even more than automobile accidents do now (or before seat-belts and more or less safe cars became popular).

It's expenditure per life saved which is interesting, rather than cost per life currently being lost.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

bitrex exaggerates, 2015 traffic deaths was 96/day.

Being a New Englander bitrex' chances of being killed in a terrorist attack are quite high... mine are nil >:-} ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142    Skype: skypeanalog |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     | 

             I'm looking for work... see my website.

Really? In the years just prior to the introduction of the Salk vaccine, there were 50,000 new polio infections annually.

A few years ago they were admitting to about a quarter million a year. And this is not people who were going to die anyway. we are talking wrong proce dures, mistakes with drugs n shit.

It would be interesting to see how many people were in the whole. I mean if 2.5 million went to the hospital they killed 10 %, if 25 million went they killed 1 %. I haven't been to a hospital in five years and that was for a cataract. I don't go to them when I get sick. In fact I have found that it works to do absolutely nothing. Your body heals itself, they just take the credit. There are exceptions but that is when you use them like mechanics. Broken bones, cataracts, shit like that.

But they could not find the black mold that almost killed me and probably w ould have killed most people. Difference is that I started out with a bette r immune system and glands and whatever. My blood sugar was so solid I coul d fast for three days easily and still work and everything. Did it many a t ime to lose weight. The black mold came in with a used mattress. Damn shame , it was a nice pillowtop one.

Yeah well that still ain't over. Thierosal was removed from the vaccines, f or the most part, a few years ago. Some claimed it was increasing the rate of autism spectrum diseases. The makers of the vaccines argued it did not.

But, remember the saying "Mad as a hatter" ? When you bought a hat the hatt er would bend the brim to the style you chose, and used mercury fumes someh ow to fix the leather into that shape. Many of them went half nuts as if ma ybe they got high off of it.

Also, mercury is considered a poison, and must never come in contact with a n open wound.

Yet the drug companies claimed it was safe to inject it into infants.

I believe that thimerosal did cause some cases of ment or neurological impa irment because that is what mercury does in the body if it gets too much. H owever my belief is not based on the statistical evidence.

There was a doctor who had like five kids and one of them was autistic. Hav ing access to be able, he had all the kids' hair samples tested for mercury and the results were not what he thought they would be. The autistic kid's hair had no mercury, the normal kids' hair did. The only logical conclusio n that can be drawn is that some bodies have the ability to shed the mercur y, whether it be in the hair, sweat, urine or whatever but others metabolis e it and it upsets the nervous system. And the brain is part of the nervous system. The biggest part.

So they removed the thimerosal from most of the vaccines and that cost them money. Why ? They are in business and have shareholders, they can't just d o things that cost the company money. If they are run like most companies, the only reason to remove the thimerosal from the vaccines was the possibil ity of a huge lawsuit. That means they found out there was a link because t hat link would have to be proven in court. If it was totally untrue then it could never be proven and they would have nothing to fear.

Yeah, heart attacks cure themselves. Or not.

Used? Good grief!

% o /

Not entirely accurate. Jim has admitted that he plans to shoot some of his more leftist neighbours when the USA falls apart. Since they would presumab ly shoot back, his chance of dying in a terrorist attack has to be finite - if small. Trump isn't all that likely to get elected.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

for the most part, a few years ago. Some claimed it was increasing the rat e of autism spectrum diseases. The makers of the vaccines argued it did not .

The guy who claimed it made numerous mistakes in the "research" on which he based his claims. The conspiracy theory nuts still believe the nonsense, b ut everybody rational has moved on.

tter would bend the brim to the style you chose, and used mercury fumes som ehow to fix the leather into that shape. Many of them went half nuts as if maybe they got high off of it.

an open wound.

It takes quite a bit of mercury to wreck your nervous system. There is a sa fe level that doesn't cause any perceptible damage,and the level that got i njected into infants was way below that.

impairment because that is what mercury does in the body if it gets too muc h.

But you don't know how is too much, because you haven't looked

points out that 0.1 microgram of methylmercury per kilogram of body weight is accepted as the safe upper limit.

No. It's a lunatic delusion.

aving access to be able, he had all the kids' hair samples tested for mercu ry and the results were not what he thought they would be. The autistic kid 's hair had no mercury, the normal kids' hair did. The only logical conclus ion that can be drawn is that some bodies have the ability to shed the merc ury, whether it be in the hair, sweat, urine or whatever but others metabol ise it and it upsets the nervous system. And the brain is part of the nervo us system. The biggest part.

Anecdotal evidence sucks, and evidence that goes against your hypothesis su cks even worse.

em money. Why ? They are in business and have shareholders, they can't just do things that cost the company money. If they are run like most companies , the only reason to remove the thimerosal from the vaccines was the possib ility of a huge lawsuit. That means they found out there was a link because that link would have to be proven in court. If it was totally untrue then it could never be proven and they would have nothing to fear.

Don't be naive. Lawsuit, particularly those heard in front of juries are a huge and very expensive gamble. Take away the thimerosal, and the lawyers l ose their excuse to sue, whether or not the thimerosal was doing any damage .

Taking out the the thimerosal was essentially a public relations exercise, and would have been paid for out of the advertising budget.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

gack!

AIUI DHS is responsible for both preventing "automobile accidents" and preventing "terrorist attacks" (also putting out fires, and panty raids...)

--
This email has not been checked by half-arsed antivirus software

Quite high compared to what? Getting hit by lightning four times in a row instead of five? 8-)

If we spent 1/10th as much on Homeland Security, would the average number of deaths per year jump immediately from around 10 to Iraq-level numbers?

My guess: probably not.

You can always make the argument that this level of expenditure is required to prevent another mass-causality situation in the vein of

9/11, or even a nuclear attack/chemical/biological attack. Unfortunately we just don't have many data points to go on to have much understanding of how common or uncommon such events are.

We have way more data on how common asteroid impacts are, and should probably be spending more money in that area given the probability/cost per life saved spread.

We wouldn't have all thee heart attack if not for the shit food they sell. And who approves this shit ? The medical industry. It's like when they had the TV commercials saying 4 out of 5 dentists approve of this brad of tooth paste. Well duh, if it is really good they make less money. Plus the fact t hat dental hygiene has nothing to do with dental health. And flouride is a bunch of shit as well.

Yup, there's a mistake I will not make again. If certain things hadn't have happened it would have gotten into the house itself and it ay have gotten condemned. As it was, we got everything out of the room and changed the car pet and pretty much everything. Also, if certain things would not have happ ened the exposure would have continued and I might be dead. My body put up a good fight for over a year but that shit is dangerous.

I won't be buying any used furniture, at least the fluffy stuff either. Thi s whole city recently went through the bedbug problem to the point where th ey temporarily closed two schools. When and if I need furniture I will use lawn furniture in the house. Plus that fact I am not into cushy, I have no problem sitting on a picnic table or whatever, just wood with no padding. A nd I do not like to lounge, I like to sit up straight.

I am actually even leery of buying new stuff. I read where these new mattre sses at the discount places are actually just recovered old mattresses that didn't cave in. No actually I think that was an "expose'" on TV a long tim e ago.

I now sleep on a bunch of blankets that I can periodically throw in the was her. No more of this shit. I am less comfortable but you know comfort is no t the best thing in the world all the time.

Only brainwashed sickening ultraliberals can assert that. But I wouldn't call it an argument.