Hi Potting a Cable Length

Hello

I have an Industrial Installation of a string of about 20 SPST Emergency Stop Switches in series, They are wired Normally Closed. 24VDC is connected to the string and the switches will interrupt the 24V when pressed in and Emergency.

The wire is 18 GA stranded and the total length of the string is about 800 feet.

The wire runs in conduit.

I believe I have an intermittent short to the conduit, usually the short occurs just momentarily so troubleshooting is difficult.

I was thinking of Hi Potting the Switch String. I was going to disconnect each end of the string and Hi Pot the cable run along with the installed E Stop Switches. To verify if some part of the conductor is very close to the conduit.

I believe the wire is rated at around 600V.

The question is what Voltage should I set the Hi Pot tester to and why. The other end of the Hi Pot tester will connect to the conduit.

Thanks

Reply to
Tube Audio
Loading thread data ...

Crank it up until something breaks. The objective here is, if possible, to turn the intermittent into a hard failure, so you can find it and fix it. I'd use a neon sign transformer, but you may not be allowed to do that.

Have you inspected all the switches? A wire short inside a conduit is much less likely than a problen at or in a junction box.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Don't do that. If the fault is intermittant in nature but does not occur during the test, you'll just burn out what was perfectly good cable. Or other devices in the circuit.

Also, use a tester designed for the application. Rent one if necessary. If you damage the e-stop system in such a way that it fails during a subsequent emergency, the sh*t will come back on you.

Crank up the voltage to a level compatible with the wire and device insulation ratings. If that doesn't reveal the failure, start shaking components and operating each switch (with insulating gloves!). Heck, try the shake test with a continuity tester first before fiddling with the hi-pot.

Here's one link:

formatting link

--
Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions stated herein are the sole property of the author. Standard
disclaimers apply. All rights reserved. For external use only. If
irritation, rash or swelling occurs, discontinue use immediately
and consult a physician. Void where prohibited.
Reply to
Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Typical control cable is 600V. When we used to test the cabling for new control circuits (I was with a large electrical utility), we always tested them at 1000VDC. Usually resistance testers ('Meggers') are DC and 600VAC is pretty close to 1000V peak, so that was our logic. Certainly a 600V control cable should accept 500VDC and still show several Megohms, even if it is very old and in in a poor environment. New cable would be 200+.

--
Jim
Reply to
Jim

If normal operation is causing a short either by an arc of not, then a "hi pot" tester is CERTAINLY going to fire at the short location. You STILL have the problem of determining WHERE to break in insulation is at.

In an 800 ft run, I cannot imagine that it would be a single piece, so there has to be break points.

Find one. Preferrably near the center of the run. Open ALL conductors at that break point. Test both segments. Test each conductor separately. That will narrow things even better. You should now know which end of the cable it is on (which segment fails). Go to that segment, and make another break point disconnection and test. Leave the good segment OUT of your test runs, and when you find another segment good, leave it out of all further testing.

After these two breaks and two tests, you should have the fault narrowed down to a 25% long segment of the whole run.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

=EF=BF=BDThe

After reading the posts I would like to know the current and voltage ratings of the contactor coil.

18 guage is small for 800 feet with the usual current requirements for a contactor. With #18 wire and 24VDC you can sink only 1.33 Amps. And for practical purposes your contactor current is limited to .13 amps. More than this the voltage across ther contactor coil will be too low for reliable operation. Not enough current for the contactor.

If you can't replace the wire with 16 or 14 use a transistor as a driver/switch at the contactor to make the 18 wire a signal conductor instead of a switch leg. Use the 24VDC for Vcc on the transistor. There are also Solid State Switch packages for this.

Most technicians should be able to wire this up with no problems with the switches, connectors and wire. Your switches do need to be selected for this. Are your switches rated for DC?

Your momentary "short" in this case may be a result of the component activity consisting of the L of the coil and the RC of the wire and the conduit. Possibly caused by spiking from an external source. A diode across the contactor coil will minimize this. 800 feet is a long way for #18 wire.

My best philosophy at 12:23 AM!

Bob AZ

Reply to
Bob AZ

Before i would start chasing down a possible short, I would verify that my coil is getting enough current to stay in, and that my 24VDC supply is not overloaded. Do you have other loads on the DC supply? If you have other loads on this supply, especially intermittent ones, that could be enough to cause the coil to drop out.

  1. I would force all other loads on the DC supply to be on, and then see how the coil in question behaves.
  2. If the supply is ruled out, then I would pull the cable off of the coil and measure the resistance of the cable, including all switches (bypass the supply). If the supply voltage divided by the system resistance is marginal, that would be a good place for a problem.
  3. If this isn't the problem... 800 feet of conduit will expand in the sun. And if you have a problem which shows up or goes away with temperature, the expanding conduit might be pulling on a loose connection.
  4. Then I would check for the short.

Good luck, Andy

Reply to
Andy

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.