A transformer winding / supply company has suggested a failure rate of 1% of its products over what I presume to be a year period. The sort of size we are talking of is around the 100VA.
Can anyone enlighten me if this is typical, just that it seems rather poor?
That is absolutely insanely horribly bad. Ordinary mains-frequency low-voltage power transformers used well within their ratings will outlast most any other part in your design. It's also hard to kill them even by moderately abusing them (cook them at extremely high temperature or arcing them will do them in). I don't know how you'd make a transformer that bad.
Of course if you're talking about a cheaply made 10kV transformer run at 125°C, that's maybe a horse of a different color.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred wrote (in ) about 'Reliability of transformers', on Mon, 12 Jul 2004:
That's a spec written by a marketroid. 1% over 10 years might be more realistic, but I'd be disappointed. I'd expect a World War 2 100 VA transformer kept in a benign environment to still work.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany wrote (in ) about 'Reliability of transformers', on Mon, 12 Jul 2004:
Battery-charger transformers that are not varnish-impregnated fail after a few years, but that's probably intentional, and is due to the bad environments (especially very high humidity) they experience. A varnished one will last forever.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
To add to Spehro's and John's concerns: Just imagine if every part in your design had a "reliability level" that would cause 1% to fail in a year? How many systems would still work after one year? How soon would the warranty overhead on this design eat up a corporation's assets?
Perhaps it's your presumption of 'a year period' that is in error. Obviously you'd need to find out for sure, however.....
Early mortality prior to shipping, shipping damage, and 'returns for other reasons' can sometimes all be lumped into the same 'total defects' category. This does not provide any meaningful representation of device reliability or failure rate, nor does it give anyone a clue as to possible methods of avoidance/improvement without more serious analysis.
But it's what a bean counter wants, and he has every right to it.
some power transformers have a thermal fuse hidden under the primery winding tape, when thay blow, winding is open. the fix is to peal back the tape to fined it, and then brige it with wire and use a external fuse. use silicon or hot glue to reseel.
Most 1940's era transformers have had an insulation failure since then. Not all... and a lot of insulation failures go undetected.
A good fraction of transformer failures are due to the stuff it supplying failing catastrophically, taking out the transformer with it. Rectifier and filter capacitor failure does this. I wouldn't attribute this as a failure due to the transformer, but maybe the manufacturer does in counting totals. The "1% over maybe a year" is not a real spec in any event.
Most 1940's era transformers have had an insulation failure since then. Not all... and a lot of insulation failures go undetected.
A good fraction of transformer failures are due to the stuff it supplying failing catastrophically, taking out the transformer with it. Rectifier and filter capacitor failure does this. I wouldn't attribute this as a failure due to the transformer, but maybe the manufacturer does in counting totals. The "1% over maybe a year" is not a real spec in any event.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.