I've inherited a tray of TQFP Spartan-2 (XC2S50, standard performance version) with date code from mid-2001.
Is it worth my while to put these down on prototypes, or have there been significant silicon changes since then/has this family been slated for discontinuation?
Thanks.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
J
John_H
If you inherited a box of the "pocket PCs" mid-2001, would you use those in your systems?
If your need is limited to stock on hand and the performance you get from them is sufficient, I'd say "go for it" but if you end up purchasing more of these devices in the long run, you'll probably be MUCH better with a current generation device. The performance is better. The density is significantly greater. The tool support is active rather than legacy. Added functionality is in the new devices. You should expect to be able to get Spartan-IIs for several more years but they are at the bottom of the "price maturity curve" and aren't cost effective compared to new parts.
Z
zwsdotcom
Maybe :) It depends how big the box was.
I just did a quick price compare vs. Spartan-III and I see what you mean. I don't have a specific need for these parts right now; nothing I build uses FPGAs. I was planning to lay down some footprints in "spare" space and wire the FPGA to the footprint of the 8-bit micro I use in an existing design, for experiments. But if I can't be sure of getting these parts on an ongoing basis, there's no point.
J
james
of
current
***********
The Spartan 2 (XC2S**) are 5 volt tolerant and will easily interface with older 8 bit micros that are 5 volt devices. T he Spartan 2E and later is not 5 volt tolerant. S
With that in mind these parts still have some minimal value.
james
J
John Adair
Whilst FPGA families have an average life of 2 years as the lead family in appropriate sector (low cost sector, or high performance sector), they usually have a very long lifetimes. I wouldn't be surprised if most of the Sparatan-II family are still around in 10 years time going by past history.
For price/performance though it is always hard to beat whatever the latest family is and unless you need the a special feature like 5V tolerance (without resistors or bus switches), or less power supply rails, it is usually worth going to the latest.
John Adair Enterpo> John_H wrote:
A
Austin Lesea
John,
Right you are. Spartan 2 is like "classic Coca-Cola", it is really hard to improve upon.
Even the original Spartan (4KXLA derivative) is still going strong.
Aust> Whilst FPGA families have an average life of 2 years as the lead family
L
Leon
Another advantage is that they are available in PLCC, I've got a tube of them somewhere.
Leon
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.