Comparison of the Co-verification tools for SoC/ASIC

Feb 02, 2004 1 Replies

Dear colleagues,



I need to find out that which verification tool would be better (overall) for the (Co)-Verification of the SoC/ASIC. We are thinking of making comparison between Seamless and Quickturn/Cadence product i.e. Cobalt.



I know Cobalt has certain benefits such as: faster speed, Higher capacity.



But still I need to know the following:


- complexity in setting-up the environment (Seamless&Specman both)



- User friendly



- Nature of the results (% wrong values in result)



- Effort required to make the environment working for simulation



- Whether valid for synchronous designs only or more



- Debug capability


I will really appreciate help from the gurus of the design/verification community.


Best regards, rajan


My type is HES.

formatting link

Best Regards, Griva

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required