There's nothing wrong with that plan, except that it involves many more moving parts
There's nothing wrong with that plan, except that it involves many more moving parts
larwe ha scritto:
why not a peltier cell, heated by a small single flame burner ?
regards
Because the burner requires fairly precise gas flow control and has a strong potential of becoming clogged and corroded. The explosive method is little more than a funnel turned upside-down, with a spark plug at the narrow end of the cone.
Certainly true. However, you can replace a lot of generators for the cost of the copper in a system that has to collect the=20 energy in a few milliseconds.
Mark Borgerson
Is the range of combustible mixtures wide enough to guarantee ignition, or do you have to monitor the fuel/air mixture?
Mark Borgerson
I think I said above someplace - no it is certainly not guaranteed. If it fails, we try again.
Lewin,
I just came across some interesting supercaps from Wima available up to
400F/2.5V. They store 1250J and the pulse current may be 600A. They can be connected in series. Datasheet here:Meindert
What was known in the trade as an FGC.
GC = Great Capacitor. F = unprintable
Aka a BMF capacitor
BM = Big Mother F = ....
And here is a real BMF complete with Ms.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required