malloc causes SIGSEGV signal with SEGV_MAPERR si_code
Oct 02, 2008 7 Replies
B
Bill
In my application, after it runs for about 3 hours, I am getting SIGSEGV signal with an si_code of SEGV_MAPERR (address not mapped to object) when it tries to do a malloc of 65536 bytes, which it does successfully numerous times before it gets this seg fault. Repeated trials show it happening at the same place.
Any ideas what may be causing this or how I might go about determining the cause? I am running Linux 2.6.26 on PowerPC.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
Rainer Weikusat
Assuming the information above is correct, ie the segfault happens inside malloc, the best guess would be 'malloc heap corrupted due to use of a dangling pointer elsewhere' (or 'writing beyond the boundaries of an allocated object'). Enabling coredumps (ulimit -c) and feeding the resulting core file to gdb should be sufficient to determine if the exception is really caused by the malloc-implementation. If it is, you could try to use a watch point to cause the debugger to stop your program when the corruption occurs.
J
Joe Pfeiffer
How numerous? Are you out of memory? How much swap do you have?
P
Paul Keinanen
While I might use malloc() at startup, I hate the use of free() due to the pool fragmentation problem, so I prefer not to use free() in systems, unless I have been in retirement for a few years, when the free() is executed :-).
Paul
L
lion3875
Are u sure that u have more free pages in memory space, may be memory leaks causing no free pages could be alloc.
B
Bill
Hundreds. Thousands if runs for any amount of time, say over 10 minutes.
Running meminfo gives the information below. What is the best way to determine if out of memory and how much swap there is while the program in running?
Take a look at "electric fence" or valgrind. They are tools to catch malloc/free errors.
EFence will replace malloc/free with versions which allocate entire pages for each item you malloc(), leaving holes between these, so it catches bugs where you run over the end of the malloc'ed area. It will also always return free()'d areas to the OS, catching bugs where you reference stale pointers. The core dumps it produces are gigantic ;-)
Valgrind will trace your program's execution and alert you when the program does illegal accesses (e.g. access the 101th element in a
100-sized array). It slows down the program extremely.
Josef
These are my personal views and not those of Fujitsu Siemens Computers!
Josef Möllers (Pinguinpfleger bei FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize (T. Pratchett)
Company Details: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.