There's confusion between two newest Energy Meter's ref. designs: MCP3909-1PH1 and MCP3909-PM1: Energy Meter Reference Designs (boards/kits) info at MCP website is conflicting - the relation between two kits is undefined and 70% of required information for these two is hidden, which requires "detective" skills from anyone pondering the selction of either board or both.

So, today I purchased "Microchip MCP3909RD-1PH1 SinglePhase EnergyMeter, $99 at Digikey. Not what I wanted (wanted MCP3909-PM1 instead), but was forced to buy that + will buy second board (MCP3909-PM1) as soon as available. Here's a problem (that makes deciding between 2 boards confusing). Two things:

1) MCP3909RD-1PH1 product webpage was OK entire week while I studied it (@MCP website), then suddenly MCP marked it as "temporarily unavailable"; and after checking its Application Software (runs on PC) + Firmware (runs on MCU, so two downloads) I discovered they appear outdated (2007) yet Hardware (demoboard itself) & Manual are fresh-new (Dec2009 to Feb2010); a possible explanation is those wares were copied (adapted) from older three-phase demoboard. OK, but Firmware looks suspicious also because #include statement refers to a completely different MCU chip - 1825K20 which is present in MCP3909-PM1 demoboard, but NOT in this MCP3909-1PH1 (this one is according to all docs is using 18F85J90), also other strange things in Assembler code are raising suspicion that wrong Firmware is posted at MCP site!? But let's assume I am wrong and Firmware works fine. However it's Assembler - C language version for this Demoboard would be better because speed is NON-isse when processing single phase 50/60Hz AC current signal, while C code makes it immensely easier to modify (or understand how it works). Whose idea was it to still use Assembler in a new DEMOboard design (year2010)? Looks like someone with "experience baggage" coming from the early Assembler days. There're many cases where Assembler is a must - e.g. DSP signal processing for RF signals, in thi scase it's counterproductive. Also: It uses Serial interface to PC, not USB (unless I am mistaken), so why Serial in 2010? Yes Serial is easier and straighforward to work with MCU's, versus USB stack; but really guys it's 2010 - now I have to stick an FTDI chip (translator) so my boss wouldn't complain on Serial-to-USB dongle hassle.

Now the docs: There's one Microchip PDF doc dated by year2010 which lists MCP3909-1PH1, another PDF also dated by year2010 only mentions MCP3909-PM1, and yet another PDF mentions both - is Microchip going thru "problem fixing" or "tentative decision" for these two boards? Note: all three PDF's are entitled the same "Energy Metering Solutions from Microchip" or similar (I maynot copied Title here exactly) -->their "Development tools" sections. If you try to search MCP website for these 2 boards - you'll be surprised by the lack of or conflicting info (I found some PDF's by doing a complicated & long search instead of straightforward search for MCP3909-PM1 or -1PH1)

So in light of MCP website marking MCP3909-1PH1 today as "temporarily Unavailable"- what's going on with it? It's pulled out of "MicrochipDirect", but "Digikey" had 5 in stock so I bought one yesterday. Was it "pulled off shelf" due to a discovered problem? If so how would I get updated if I already bought current version today?

2) There's a related Ref.Design/DevBoard (kit) part# MCP3909RD-PM1 I am MORE interested in it than in the one purchased today (MCP3909RD-1PH1), but MCP3909-PM1 is still marked as "Coming Soon" May I ask this:

How long to wait until it's available for sale? Can I get SOMETHING for it now, as I am 95% likely to buy it but eager to see some docs: Schematics + SOURCE CODE are most important (but boardlayout/Gerbers not expecting now, though would be appreciated). I have your MCP3909-1PH1, looks related but not the same, what's the relation between two? I don't mind if MCP3909-PM1 docs are still "in flux" and not finalized, just wanted to see any docs + software for it. Also I HOPE IT'S USING USB, NOT SERIAL PORT!!!

After a lengthy search, I was lucky to find only an Application Note AN1291 referring to this Dev.Board MCP3909-PM1 Again I say "lucky" as most people would not spend that much searching for something that appears to be missing. It's just a short Application Note, not a manual, no schematics (!), no software (application and/or Firmware), nothing yet.

So to conclude I hope Microchip Engineer(s) can comment on what's going on with these two Power/Energy Meter Reference Designs, why documentation & Software is "fragmented" and confusing. I also hope for C-language software & USB-to-serial solution for the one I already bought MCP3909-1PH1, and schematics/software/docs for the one coming up: MCP3909-PM1.

====================================== UPDATE - 28Feb2010: Here's a clarification which may introduce you guys to these two great Reference Design Boards from Micrchip and the only way to locate their webpages:

A) Some sources use slightly different part#'s for these two boards: MCP3909RD-PM1 and MCP3909RD-1PH1 which is the same except with 'RD" added (reference Design).

B) Best method of locating Microchip webpage srelated to it is by going to: MCP Home --> Products-->DevelopmentTools-->Analog and Interface Demo/EvaluationTools -->select icon for "MixedSignal/EnergyMeasurements" If you try to search MCP website or even Google entire Web for these two part#'s, not much comes up except a few useless PDF's, only one of which has importance. You have to instead go thru navigation I provided above.

I spoke with Microchip by phone and engineers are looking into this mix-up/confused information and ordering problem, a Ticket was created. These boards are great in Design time-reduction, yes it costs approx $200 total (so far $99+shipping, as second board is still not orderable) but better than re-inventing something Microchip already did fine. ======================================

Reply to
Stan Starinski
Loading thread data ...

Mark Licetti is me. Sorry for using alias, and there's ANOTHER Mark Licetti who is NOT me which confuses people.

This original post about Microchip Energy measurement IC's and MCU using along with it, posted 10 minutes ago, was by me even though shows "Licetti" in name field

This note is only to make sure & correct direction of responses (followups).

Reply to
Stan Starinski


You may not have noticed but this is not a microchip employee forum.

Why use a PIC in this application? they are not code efficient, not power efficient, not debug friendly, and the appnotes are written by a luddite (ASM!) and possibly not the cheapest for flash size per dollar.

Maybe go to NXP, Energy Micro, ST, Atmel or even TI.

Reply to

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.