The bigger problem is the switching transient when the source is turned on or selected.
The bigger problem is the switching transient when the source is turned on or selected.
... or that troublesome transient complaint that HH amplifiers used to get from time to time, where they would latch up and apply lots of DC to the speaker(s). I never really knew the source of the problem but I did wonder about the design of the current sources in the bias chains which showed a remarkable similarity to a unijunction!
Chris
a
its
so the
blocks
send it
since a
No surprise there.
e:
Mike Terrill making his usual sophisticated contribution to the discussion.
I don't know where we'd be without his wisdom and insight.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
e:
s not a
of its
pled so the
e amp blocks
ups.com...
signal
nd send it
as
s by
nd since a
hich
e to
his.
al in
aThis seems unlikely.
"Conventional" is much less specific than "digital" - you were simply careless in your choice of words.
"Conventional" is an odd word to use in this context - one doesn't choose to use a particular sort of multiplexer because there are socially accepted conventions on what you need in a particular circuit, you use something that will work in that circuit.
It may seem obvious to you now, but you didn't bother making this less- than-helpful distinction when you originally corrected Panfilero. The analog/digital distinction captures more of the idea you were trying - rather ineptly - to get across. Of course, there are internally buffered analog multiplexers, which aren't bidirectional either, and "multiplexer/demultipler" does exclude these parts but you need to prime an unsophisticated audience fairly carefully (as I've done here) to make the title meaningful.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Enough DC bias on the right loudspeaker could persuade the loudspeaker to generate acoustic side-bands of the AC content of the electrical input to the speaker. Guy Macon discusses the mechanism in more detail.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Unless the speaker/amplifier was designed by cretins, there will be a 'DC blocking' capacitor at the input so it won't make any difference at all.
What you think is totally wrong. Apply a significant DC offset *directly* to the speaker and you'll get a very nasty effect.
Graham
He said a "speaker/amplifier".
Read the damn post FFS !
Graham
You can run a 4066 off +/- 7.5V and offset the logic inputs vial level translators. NO DC added.
Graham
The 4053 ? is also very popular in this kind of task. But you can make a 4016 or
4066 behave equivalently too with split supplies.Graham
Is this an ultra low cost design ? If not use something designed for the job like DG308s and DG211s.
Or even use a jfet (suitably driven). That's what I do. The J107-111 and thier complements J174 etc are very good for this and typically used in pro-audio.
Graham
Yes.
There is also a danger of 'bottoming' the voice coil or driving it out of the gap under conditions of extreme DC offset. Either may result in terminal damage.
Graham
Most speakers these days are not sealed cabinet designs anyway but ported.
Graham
In the early days of high power PA rigs such failures would often set the speaker cone alight !
Graham
Latch up ? Do you mean FAIL ?
I still have 4 H-H TPAs from those days and none ever 'latched up'. But I also didn't drive them into 4 ohms. Any fool could see they had inadequate heatsinking (as was often if not the norm back then). Phase Linears used for PAs became known as Flame Linears !
Graham
Not *THAT* again ! ;~)
Graham
Seen that done . With exteme care you might get the coil back in the gap.
Graham
Actually, it's a linear motor coupled to a cardboard cone (usually). Sometimes more exotic materials will be used.
Graham
Too true.
Graham
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required