Are mercury thermometers more accurate than blue wax or red alcohol thermometers?
Mercury
Not intrinsically. Each has a well-known coefficient of thermal expansion; the variations come from the defects in the bore of the tube.
Hope This Helps! Rich
...assuming that coefficient of expansion is reasonably constant W.R.T. temperature in the temperature range of interest, which seems to be an acceptable assumption.
Wikipedia is surprisingly unhelpful on this:
Martin
And the OP may be interested to know that the above link says that alcohol expands MUCH more than does mercury (750 vs. 182 (* 10^-6 K^-1), volumetric expansion).
Martin
It might be worth reminding the OP, if the thermometer gets broken - mercury is toxic!
It tastes like tuna.
Oh my! So does my girlfriend.
Bob
While mercury is toxic (as are all heavy metals) it really isn't that toxic when in its elemental form.
If a child bites the end off a mercury thermometer and swallows it, casualty will be far more worried about the glass than about the mercury.
Some organic compounds of mercury are amongst the most toxic chemicals.
Tim.
In article , nimby_GIMME_SOME snipped-for-privacy@roadrunner.com says...>
Why shouldn't Mercury taste something like Venus?
You should teach her how to bathe.
Cheers! Rich
This is a dumb question !! A thermometer is only as accurate as its Calibration ! after all , all of of the marks are relative ! Is the question being asked "Which is more reproduce-able". Maybe it should be Is a Thermocouple more accurate than RTC element or a Thermistor! Yukio YANO
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required