Help please with DC motor control

Greetings All, I am working on a project in my shop that requires constant tension on a nylon cord. The cord comes is pulled off of a spool a certain amount and cut. I have drag on the spool because I don't want it keep spinning when I'm not pulling. But pulling against this drag is tiresome. So I was thinking that I could use a motor to help pull the cord. The motor would not have quite enough torque to pull the cord off of the spool by itself. But when I pull on the cord it will be easy because the motor would be helping me. I'm wondering how to control the torque of the DC motor. I think that if I keep the current limited to a certain value the torque the motor can develop will also be limited. If the voltage to the motor is set at a certain value then it will only be able to reach a certain speed. If I set the voltage so that the motor will spin fast enough to keep up with the maximum rate at which I pull the cord will I be able to pull the cord slower without having the motor try to feed the cord too fast? I'm hoping I can just use a current and voltage limited power supply to do what I want. One drawback I see is that when the cord is not being pulled the motor will be stationary but will be consuming power because it is pulling against the drag on the spool. So I would need to use a motor that could be stalled forever without overheating. If a brushed motor is used will this be really hard on the brushes? And could a brushless motor be used instead? Thank You, Eric

Reply to
etpm
Loading thread data ...

Just use a current source, or a current-limited power supply. If rotation is slow enough torque is constant for a fixed current value. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

A prony brake with a catenary arm will serve you with no need to use a drive motor. The string would pick the arm up as you need it and release the brake. This type of brake can have a spring on one side so the load will not spin backwards to easy but will allow it to have tension on the forward movement. The tension most likely would be more than you need so the catenary arm, as it gets picked up via the string, will release the strap around the friction wheel and remove the brake tension. But if the weight of the spool is still heavy for you when the prony brake has released you can assist it with a motor by putting a pot on the catenary arm to drive the spool forward. some people have used Rheostats to push the motor forward as the arm get's picked up.

Also, you can use a dancer regulator system, look here and study the image.

formatting link

Jamie

Reply to
Maynard A. Philbrook Jr.

I vote for the Prony brake.

But if you absolutely must use a motor, yes, a permanent-magnet DC motor will generate a torque that is proportional to current, and yes, you can use it as an aid as you describe.

Get a motor that will give you your desired torque at a current that's at or below its rated current, and you should be fine from a heating and brush-wear standpoint.

Note that some motors do not put out consistent torque: their torque constant differs depending on where the armature is in relation to the magnets, and they exhibit "cogging torque" where the armature seeks to maximize the amount of iron that "sees" the magnets. Both of these can muck you up -- the best solution that doesn't involve picking through data sheets or tons of experimentation is to use a servo motor.

A brushless motor will also work, but you'd need to get a drive for it that can be commanded to a specific current level. These can be had, for $$$, but finding one surplus will require a lot of diligence.

--
Tim Wescott 
Wescott Design Services 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Wescott

** Can't you just reduce the drag on the spool a bit ?

If you must use a DC motor to assist, go for a 12V automobile blower motor.

formatting link

These have lots of poles ( 11 is typical ) so torque is very smooth.

Current regulation / limiting can be done with a couple of 12V auto brake light bulbs, with wattage picked to suit the torque you want. Start with a single 21W as see how that goes.

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

Move the drag to rub against the circumference of the line wound on the spool. That gets you constant force.

If the required drag to stop the spool is too great run the cord through a block and tackle arrangement to lift the drag when pulled.

--
umop apisdn 


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
Reply to
Jasen Betts

I have read several answers to this post already, all of them are off topic.

A DC motor can be regulated to deliver constant torque by using a series resistor which measures the motor current, then feeds the signal back to a servo amplifier with gain adjustment. But then you will not have constant (rotational) speed.

This is not the same problem as constant speed control. For DC speed control you would use a tacho-generator or when pulsing the motor you can use the motor itself as tacho-generator during the pulse pause.

This is not a simple task, but there are some hand drill machines on the market which have adjustable speed and adjustable torque. To be precise: adjustable maximum torque.

One cannot have constant speed and constant torque in one when the mechanical load changes permanently. You cannot have constant torque if the load changes. Only a maximum torque regulator can be achieved but at the cost of changing speed.

w.

Reply to
Helmut Wabnig

I got an electric motor here,

formatting link
Just click on electric motors on the left side. Decent supply at good prices. Mikek

--
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 
http://www.avast.com
Reply to
amdx

Suppose you used a constant-speed motor, turning at some low RPM. It could turn a shaft or a drum.

The feed cord would make one or more loops around the drum. If you don't pull on the cord, it slips on the rotating drum. If you pull, it tightens up and the motor assists. It's self-regulating.

I've seen this done on ships to let a crew guy apply an easily regulated amount of force to a big line or cable. He loops it around a slowly rotating thingie (nautical term) and pulls as needed. The mechanical force multiplication is huge.

Vaguely like this:

formatting link

--
John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

google electric capstain

formatting link

--
John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

Thanks for the replies everyone. After reading the replies I am a little confused. If I use a current and voltage limited power supply and there is not quite enough power for the motor to pull against the drag the motor will be stalled. When I pull on the cord the motor will of course turn, but only when I pull on the cord. If I pull the cord the motor will then just draw less current, right? So the torque it develops plus the pulling force will be just enough to overcome the drag, won't it? If not, then what am I missing? Thanks, Eric

Reply to
etpm

Yes, you have it, I was looking for the term to do an image search. The word used by deckhands is cathead or catshead. This url shows several, in pictures 3, 4, 5, and 6.

formatting link
When lifting a load out of the hold on the boats, the rope goes from the load up over a pulley and down to the cathead, wrapped around once, just a little tension on the loose end of the rope causes enough friction to start lifting the load. On the boats they usually have hydraulic motors. I like the idea. Mikek

--
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 
http://www.avast.com
Reply to
amdx

Yeah, I had a hard time remembering the search terms. I used to have a sailboat, and design marine automation systems, and go out on ships and stuff, but it's been a long time. Warm and dry has its own appeal.

I've seen steam-powered capstains on older ships.

The sailboat capstain winch things cost kilobucks. "Why have a sailboat when you can throw your money directly in the water?"

--
John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

LOL! When I talk to anyone thinking about getting a boat, I always tell them the same thing. "Get a friend with a boat, every time you go fishing on the boat, give them some money for fuel. If you really feel energetic, help clean the boat, change the oil, clean out the bilge, fix the bilge pump, pay the insurance,wash and wax it, help them fix the water pump, replace the broken pin in the propeller, Winterize, clean the battery connections, replace the battery,lube the bearings on the trailer, replace the wiring on the trailer lights. There's much more, but you get the point. I don't really say the second paragraph, but that's some of the reason I say, "Get a friend with a boat, every time you go fishing on the boat, give them some money for fuel. Mikek

--
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 
http://www.avast.com
Reply to
amdx

John Larkin prodded the keyboard

Its called a "Capstan" :-)

--
Best Regards: 
                       Baron.
Reply to
Baron

You mean current, not power. Torque in a permanent-magnet DC motor is proportional to current, not power.

That depends on where the voltage limit on the power supply kicks in. If you have it set high enough then the current in the motor will stay constant, and the torque will, too.

Probably.

Nothing that I can think of off the top of my head, but given the other suggestions so far it does seem to be a wasteful way to go about the job.

--
Tim Wescott 
Wescott Design Services 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Wescott

Greetings Tim, I understand that torque is proportional to current. When I used the word power I was thinking about watts, voltage times current. But I see where I was wrong. Low current and high volts would be the same wattage as high current and low volts. In this situation current is what matters for torque. Though the other solutions have their merits I think the convenience of having the same pulling force no matter what speed I pull the cord, within reason, will be best for me. So another question. I see lots of chips for driving low current BLDC motors. If I was to use one of these and the motor was stalled would the motor driver still try to make the motor move? Do any work like that? They need no commutation but instead supply a constantly rotating field and the motor tries to spin at the correct RPM? I need to look on the web to see if what I want is available. Eric

Reply to
etpm

The "needs no commutation" part will kill you in this application. AFAIK those chips _do_ need commutation -- they generate it by sensing the back- EMF of the spinning motor, which you can't do with a motor that's stationary.

You'd need a BLDC motor with commutation outputs (usually three Hall sensors), and a driver that knows what to do with those outputs. And if you're moving it slowly, expect to feel a perceptible "bump" every time a Hall detector switches.

For all that I'm usually in the business of providing fancy solutions to simple problems -- I think you're over-complicating things here. If you're going to do it with a DC motor, just get a surplus brushed motor and a cheap constant-current supply, and don't mess with BLDC stuff unless you're in it for the journey and not the destination.

--
Tim Wescott 
Wescott Design Services 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Wescott

Greetings Tim, I am in it partly for the journey. To begin with I am just going to use one of the DC motors I have sitting around waiting to be used. However, after thinking about BLDC motors and commutation I realized that the motor drivers must initially energize the motor coils to make a rotating magnetic field so the motor will spin up to some minimum RPM so the the driver can detect the back EMF or hall effect switches for commutation. Which makes me wonder if I can find a driver which doesn't need commutation but instead just energizes the coils at a certain frequency, like the way an induction motor works. Then the motor can spin at any RPM from stall up to the rotating field RPM. In fact, I bet someone has written the code for an Arduino to do this. I should look for it. Thanks, Eric

Reply to
etpm

The hall effect switches are static; they let the controller know what quadrant the armature is in whenever they have power applied.

There are "sensorless" brushless motor controllers, but they are really only useful for driving loads that present little or no back-torque at low speeds, and that tend to run at 10% of top speed or higher - like fans, or RC airplane propellers.

Induction motors are qualitatively different from BLDC motors. Induction motors work because the armature gets dragged along with the rotating magnetic field. As such they are "self timed". BLDC motors are synchronous machines: the rotor must be in step with the rotating magnetic field. You can run a BLDC motor by rotating the magnetic field open-loop, but then its working like a stepper motor. You really can't generate much torque reliably that way, and if the motor slips out of synchronization the _average_ torque will go to zero, no matter how much vibration is added by the coils.

For all of the above reasons, whenever a BLDC motor must generate significant torque at low speeds, it's got hall-effect sensors.

--
Tim Wescott 
Wescott Design Services 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Wescott

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.