"....It depends how you count "steps"."
Indeed.
I suppose something like "the number of distinct voltage changes per cycle" might be a good first approximation of something to call steps and to count.
In your example I would count something like "3" or maybe "2" or "4" - I always have trouble with boundary conditions...
In any case, it seems that the device you had was effective. And the only thing I could imagine as having fewer steps would be a similar device that didn't have the pause at zero...
And yet it was effective - I wonder if it would have worked with the light dimmer mentioned above...