"David L. Jones"** Questions for DLJ.1. What does a STB's pic quality look...
J
Jasen Betts
IIRC it was used in "War Games" (1983)
J
Jasen Betts
Not all modems provided electronic control of the "hook switch" (i forget the correct term) if you were lucky you had one that did.
A
Archimedes' Lever
Want to play a game?
J
Jasen Betts
there's not such thing,
derive the timimngs from the mac address
J
John Fields
It never was.
S
Sylvia Else
Helps if there's a standard that says how, which was my original question.
Sylvia.
S
Sylvia Else
Typo. Should have been obvious.
Sometimes. Sometimes not.
If you know of a standard, then why not provide a reference?
Sylvia.
J
John Fields
No, it wasn\'t.
Your original question was the subject of this thread, and when you were
given the answer you quickly dodged and changed the subject in order to
further your troll.
With as much information as you\'ve been presented with, by now it should
be clear to you why things are done the way are and why your
jibber-jabber is meaningless tripe.
I suggest that if you\'re still as ignorant as you seem to be you start
here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=rs-232c&aq=0&oq=RS-232
and work your way up to more modern telecommunications hardware and
protocols.
JF
J
John Fields
As should have been the reason why we have crossover cables.
D
David Segall
You seem to have missed the point of the OP's question. You are excused because you are of an age when an RS232 or Centronics interface was normal.
As other posters have pointed out it was cheaper to manufacture straight through cables and in those days there was a clear distinction the devices at each end of a cable. Pin n of one device could reasonably be defined as a receiver and Pin n of the "other" device could be defined as a transmitter. In the last thirty years that has changed and today it is preferable to treat all devices as peers.
The OP wanted to know why the distinction between devices existed rather than _always_ connecting them with a crossover cable. It was a perfectly reasonable question and she has been provided with sensible answers by those who managed to understand it.
D
David Segall
I don't think it requires a "standard" to identify the wires. A NIC must be able to identify a valid packet so swapping two wires until it does so is not a demanding task now that a microprocessor is incorporated on every device.
J
JosephKK
Part of the issue was to make cable testing easier for low end techs, they are pin for pin.
J
JosephKK
Yes. It is part of the IEEE 802.3 series. See:
formatting link
.
J
JosephKK
situation.
Add some conditions. There is an orderly passing sequence. Each time you get the microphone you may speak a small permitted say or not. When done speaking or if you have nothing to say you immediately pass the microphone.
.
J
JosephKK
Wow, did you ever get that one wrong. See:
formatting link
J
JosephKK
Snide answers to Sylvia's History question do not redound well to your status.
J
John Fields
Why is the manner in which I address Sylvia or the status of my "status"
any of your concern?
JF
S
Sylvia Else
I was thinking that a standard would be required that specified the delays, or the means of calculation of the delays, to be used between trying different combinations, so as to avoid the situation where two NICs undermine each other's attempts to find a working combination.
Sylvia.
D
David Segall
I think you will find what you are looking for in "IEEE 802.3 LAN/MAN CSMA/CD Access Method" but I have not read it.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.