voltage control oscillator

Jan 25, 2008 28 Replies

And what useful purpose does this jammer serve?

Iranian "fast" boat ?:-)

...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | |

formatting link
| 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

According to

formatting link
,

Land and maritime mobile communications, and the 2-meter ham band.

I wonder where he's at, when he's not surfing googlegroups. ;-)

Cheers! Rich

Pakistan, apparently. The NNTP-Posting-Host: header line gets you 203.99.178.174 which gets you

inetnum: 203.99.160.0 - 203.99.191.255 netname: PTCL descr: Pakistan Telecommunication descr: Company Limited country: PK

Rich Webb Norfolk, VA

Okay, so far we have this Ali Baba who wants to set off a communications jammer with a cheap Chinese LCD clock alarm...hmmmm, so the jammer and clock are to be pre-placed at the location of the receiver to be disabled at about the time something else is going on Ali doesn't want the people at the receiver to know about.

Maybe just an elaborate practical joke to be played on someone such as a dispatcher?

formatting link

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

"it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

Maybe or maybe not. The aspect of remote activation on a schedule fits a railway scenario pretty well. The plan could be to defeat a CBTC ( communications based train control) system attempting to automatically bring a train to a stop under any one of a multitude of hazardous and emergency circumstances such as broken track or block occupied status. This would fit a driverless system pretty well, maybe a subway system somewhere.

sir what u said i cant understand?

The act of jamming radio communications is illegal everywhere except in certain very narrowly defined circumstances. If you were covered by those circumstances then you would, presumably, already have legitimate access to the necessary technical data. If you don't then it's a good bet that you aren't.

Rich Webb Norfolk, VA

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required