This makes HHS management of PPACA look like a model of efficiency:
- posted
10 years ago
This makes HHS management of PPACA look like a model of efficiency:
That is the painful macro view. Just look at any individual military project, i.e. a micro view. Nothing gets done on budget. The Gerald Ford carrier is a prime example.
the usual political response to stories of money wasted on bureaucracy is a new layer of bureaucracy that controls and documents that the money used on the old bureaucracy is not wasted
it creates jobs, both sides want to say they created jobs even if it using government money, one side just prefers those jobs to be creating stuff painted in camouflage so that they won't be called socialist
I'm sure there is also a lot of stuff on the military budget for appearance that other countries would put on a different budget
the US military is huge but the budget is gigantic
-Lasse
O & M dwarfs R &D and development and acquisition costs. The point of the s tory is the DoD has refused to comply with the law for 20 years, and has be en defrauding America for decades. They don't want to development an accura te accounting system because they know that will be the end of a large part of their wasteful activities. The President can rectify this atrocity. It would be reasonable to give them a year to fix the problem, which is more t han ample time given their resources, after which, failing to comply with t he directive, he can order a general stand down of all of their activities, except combat operations, combat support, and relief operations, fire the JCS, the SecDef and all of his deputies, and start firing generals, admiral s, and SES, until he gets the people in there who will produce results.
that's a awful lot of powerful people and companies making lots of money to start a fight against
don't you think he has enough trouble already with that another project of his that involves powerful people and companies making lots of money
-Lasse
He's already co-opted the industry side, the remaining opposition is just Tea Party windbags which he's going to have to deal with regardless of the issue.
OK, since you started some data cherry picking: How many aircraft carriers did we have at the beginning of WW2, and how many at the end? What the age of our oldest carrier? What is the average age? Then, with that in mind, explain again just how bad the problem of a new carrier is.
?-)
Do the research and let me know.
Other than ISR, the DoD breaks things and kills people. The question is just how much do we need to devote to breaking things and killing people. A base in the US provides defense of the US. Cross the border and expect things to be broken and death. [OK, no illegal alien comments needed here.] A carrier is to break things and kill people in a foreign country. So the USAF and US Army is defense, but the Navy is for those that believe offense is the best defense.
It just isn't the 12 billion to build the carrier, but staffing it and operating it is an ongoing expense.
Ho hum...So what else is new....
"...just how bad the problem of a new carrier is."? uh,...doesn't that mean we have NO friends, so we can't use nearby land?
That is often the case. Remember 1986?
The number I heard is more like $15M daily, this article gives another number, maybe it is an average of underway and port:
with
is.
You made the claims, you provide the backup.
Even today, lack of naval power is debilitating in diplomacy. Thibk that through.
?-)
is.
miso seems to think that maintaining at least some semblance of having a fleet is a bad idea. Then miso began conflating using non-US territory with the issue of building a new carrier. Don't expect me to know why that was done.
?-)
You're talking about gunboat diplomacy which just proves his point.
They can call it whatever they like, but it's all gunboat diplomacy. Notice the carriers have been largely unnecessary when it's used. As for disaster relief, like we're doing in Philippines right now, Military Sealift Comman d puts WAY more relief supplies and equipment on the scene than the 'for sh ow' carrier.
If the U.S. does not have alliances in the region allowing the use of their territory for military operations, then , by definition, the U.S. does not belong in that region of the world.
It is true that everyone always knew this was going on, but the details rev eal the total hypocrisy of the anti-Obama crowd using the HealthCare.gov fi asco as some kind of pivotal event. The story talks about the AirForce dump ing a $2B accounting program that was too messed up to salvage, and that is not a projected $2B, that is after actually spending $2B on it. And that's just one case, there are hundreds of others.
Societies keep the possessions they have the power to hold, not the ones they hold by right. Google for "realpolitik".
The West agonizes over a whole lot of stuff that the rest of the world laughs at. Our grandfathers would have laughed too.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
You make the naive assumption that "that region of the world" is somehow isolated from this. The real world has been smaller than that for a couple of hundred years, Mr. Chamberlain.
eveal the total hypocrisy of the anti-Obama crowd using the HealthCare.gov fiasco as some kind of pivotal event. The story talks about the AirForce du mping a $2B accounting program that was too messed up to salvage, and that is not a projected $2B, that is after actually spending $2B on it. And that 's just one case, there are hundreds of others.
If these were slave ships--excuse me, "Marketplaces"--that I were being forced to serve on, I'd be equally upset.
Otherwise, it's just another example of the folly of centralized government. We tolerate it, in part because at least it's for a legitimate, authorized purpose of our central government--the common defense.
But yes, of course it should be better.
Cheers, James Arthur
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.