They're crap for DC performance, but if you can stand the dissipation, they can be pretty good for noise in noninverting mode.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
They're crap for DC performance, but if you can stand the dissipation, they can be pretty good for noise in noninverting mode.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Linear, National, what's the difference. ;)
Thanks
Phil Hobbs
Rick C wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
Your "news" is old and now incorrect. The "criteria" has changed.
But yeah... we have no clue about where it is or how much... here.
.
The criteria may have changed, but it still does not provide for enough tes ting to find those who are spreading the disease. Having 1 or 1.5 or 2 mil lion test kits available is great, but not of much use if they aren't used. Waiting for symptoms to show up isn't going to stop the spread.
I won't say anymore about this hear. I don't want to trash the thread with off topic stuff we can discuss elsewhere.
I think the're being careful with the language. Each test kit can test something like 400 (384?) people, so when they say 1M tests (not 1M test kits), that's only 25,000 kits. I suspect when they run the kit, you get to test the number of samples filling the plate. So if you require an immediate result, you have to run it with a small number of wells filled.
I like the LT1361 and 62 opamps. All of these are what I call CFB+VFB, with an internal CFB stage creating super-fast slewing, high-Z inputs and a high gain-bandwidth VFB mode.
Right. The only one with more slew rate of the VFB's in your table is the LM7171 Both much to fast for me. :^)
George H.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required