On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 4:07:56 PM UTC-4, snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrot e:
:ar
el >
if not
ears to
but it
u g 5 Amps ( o, ultra
ng a
should
ay so
ay. The
. etage
lead acid cell tempco per cell is -2mV/oC, his macro-threshold gets divided by 12, will be hard to be off a few hundred mV cell from the 2.4V full cha rge and it won't amount to a hill of beans. You think the cheap controller is temperature compensated? Really? Show me the thermocouple probe that com es with them.
You're right about the floating. But simply charging to a termination voltage then stopping only uses ~80% of the battery's capacity, and, absent a periodic equalization capability, sulfates the battery.
Bill could terminate on current dropping after hitting topping voltage. That's better for the battery, and it's more robust.
Tempco is -3mV/*C per cell, or -36mV/*C for a 24V battery from the nominal
25*C values. If the desert rat's battery is outside in a solar shack it would be quite easy to be off 400mV. An easy, cheesy temp-compensation is to put a temp-compensated charger in the same environment as the battery. It's not very good, but it doesn't have to be to be a big improvement over no compensation at all.It's been thirty years since I designed a commercial lead-acid acid charger , so all the above is IIRC / YMMV.
Nice graphs here:
dinately long time to charge the batteries, if not, it makes no difference whether you're operating on the MPP or not. Since as things stand now the p anel overcharges and ruins the battery, there is a good chance the MPP is d oubly a non-consideration.
On a sunny day El Raton might want to run some loads AND charge his battery . Or run a lot of loads plus discharge his battery to meet peak demand, if need be.
Having the capacity doesn't mean you always have to use it, but it also doesn't mean you have to waste it. The man paid for a $180W panel--one assumes he wanted 180W.
Cheers, James Arthur