Read a little about isolated Cuk converters. Why are they not used instead of Buck, boost, Buck-boost converters? They work best with CCM but can of cause also use DCM. The original patents are expired:
Cuk topology is current loading/dumping, which means both input and output ripple is a lot easier to tame. Hey there is an inductor for "free" in series with the input and output.
( Here only the basic unisolated Cuk is described:
I have only found one (non-isolated) Cuk chip:
It is even possible couple the input/output inductor to (almost) zero input ripple.
-The "worst"/"impossible" Cuk to design seems to be the Integrated Magnetics Cuk Converter (IMCC, "DC transformer") because of "the two RHP zeros". Why is that a problem? Can the control be some AI? In DCM a each cycle can be done separately so you have full control? Note: The IMCC is the 1:1 transformer and input/output-transformer integrated.
It is called a DC transformer because of (almost) zero input and output ripple".
-boostbuck.com: Easy Design of the Boostbuck Family of Converters: Beef:
home.netvigator.com: Cuk converter:
T.S. Finnegan (January, 1991). "Cúk: the best SMPS" (på English). Electronics World & Wireless World ISSN: 0959-8332 Discontinued in 1995. Continued by Electronics World (ISSN: 1365-4675).: pp.69--72. Look at table at page 71. Quote: "... The table below gives the effective primary and secondary copper losses, and the transistor and diode stress levels for the three types of converter, operating under identical conditions, for three different output voltages. The Cúk converter is more efficient and has lower stress levels in almost every respect ...."
Terrence Finnegan (July, 1991). "Design brief: 60W Cuk converter". Electronics World & Wireless World ISSN: 0959-8332 Continued by Electronics World (ISSN: 1365-4675).: pp.596--600.
?uk, Slobodan; Middlebrook, R. D. (June 8, 1976). "A General Unified Approach to Modelling Switching-Converter Power Stages" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (Cleveland, OH.): pp.73-86:
Glenn