So say you have an RCL circuit and are looking at the Johnson noise (Created by the R) that is across the capacitor. And assume that the circuit has a decent Q. Then the voltage noise at (and near) the resonance frequency will be Q times higher than it would be without the L and C. This implies (by energy conservation if nothing else) that the voltage noise at frequencies not near the resonance must be reduced.
It's like the resonance sucks up all the nearby noise. (I think this is right.) Could you then use this effect to reduce the Johnson noise in some frequency band you were interested in, by sticking an LC at some point outside that band?
(Or is there some fatal flaw in my logic?) TIA George H.
If the RLC are all in parallel, the LC looks open at Fr, so the noise voltage is unloaded at Fr and pretty much unloaded nearby.
You can Spice this. A resistor can have noise in LT Spice in the frequency domain. In the time domain, LT Spice resistors are noiseless, and LT Spice doesn't have a time-domain noise generator, but you can make one; we had a thread about that a while back.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
The resonant mode is a single classical degree of freedom, so it has a mean excitation of kT/2. Changing the Q let's you trade off peak PSD vs bandwidth, but that's all.
I ran into the mechanical equivalent of this with attractive-mode atomic force microscopes in about 1987.
Hi Tim, (I'm already eating humble pie, 'cos my mistake.) The noise across the resistor won't change, if I measure the voltage across the cap it'll be Q times bigger, at resonance.
You can Spice this. A resistor can have noise in LT Spice in the frequency domain. In the time domain, LT Spice resistors are noiseless, and LT Spice doesn't have a time-domain noise generator, but you can make one; we had a thread about that a while back.
You can easily 'add' noise and be able to include any non-linear effects in the circui by setting up the circuit to run .tranoise, which combines the .tran and the .noise into a single analysis run, EXCEPT it enables you to see the effects of non-linear operation, unlike the .noise analysis.
Great for looking at non-linear operation and yielding calibrated FFT noise floors.
The attached .asc shows an example of .tranoise to analyze a VERY simple RLC circuit.
Note the two independent gaussian white noise sources have VERY flat spetrums.
go through clear out the two sets of 'spaces' and straighten out the word wrap! those two lines are LONG!
SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=100u TEXT 1328 -128 Right 2 !.param R1=1k TEXT 312 -400 Left 2 !.options plotwinsize=0\n.param k=1.38e-23 T=300\n.param N=1000000 dt=1uS TEXT 304 -296 Left 2 !.param fstart={1/N/dt} fstop={1/2/dt}\n.param tstart={0.1*N*dt} tstop={1.1*N*dt} TEXT 304 -136 Left 2 !.tran 0 {tstop} {tstart} {dt/10}\n.ic V(ou)=0 I(L1)=-88.6161nA\n.save V(out) I(L1) TEXT 1616 -216 Left 2 !.param R2=100k TEXT 840 -400 Left 2 ;Note fstart=1Hz or BW of FFT, fstop=500kHz, FFT is irrevelant above 500kHz\n tstart=100mS to allow stabilizing, and tstop=1.1 to allow 'window' of 1 second total TEXT 304 -216 Left 2 ;.ac lin 10001 990 1010 TEXT 304 -176 Left 2 ;.noise V(out) Vin dec 10000 {fstart} {fstop} TEXT 800 -456 Left 3 ;TRANOISE EXAMPLE Simple RLC Circuit
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.