You could try connecting two caps in parallel, charging them to about
13.2 kV discharging them across a 3 turn work coil. However, with two caps you'll only develop about 174 Joules. But it may be enough to dent the can a bit to show the effect. Using four caps in parallel would be better. You could also use two caps and a higher charging voltage, but you'll see shorter capacitor life - increase it enough (say to 22 kV) and you may only see one shot... :^)The peak current is virtually independent of the spark gap. It's a function of the energy initially stored in the cap and the inductance in the circuit.
0.5*LI^2 = 0.5*CV^2 or Ipeak = V*sqrt(C/L)Assuming that work coil L is about 1 uH, bank C is 2 uF, and V is 13.2 kV, then Ipeak would be about 18.7 kA total, or about 9 kA per capacitor. This system will oscillate at about 92 kHz, and the skin depth at this frequency is only about 0.008", so much more of the energy will go into shrinking the can. The peak current may or may not exceed the capacitor's ratings - the folks at General Atomics would need to provide you with the actual specs for these caps.
Using four caps in parallel will provide ~350 Joules at peak current of
26.4 kA at about 65 kHz, but the skin depth at this frequency is about 0.013" so shrinking efficiency will be reduced. The lower peak current of 6.1 kA/cap may be better for longer cap life, and the higher energy level may provide better overall performance.Bert