I've run into patent attorneys, as well as the USPO, that simply did not understand what was being described, so I can understand that Jim's assertion ( while not eloquently stated :>))) ) might be valid.
Patent attorneys are lawyers, few are engineers, and NONE are experienced design engineers. They became lawyers, in my opinion, because they were not able to experience the elation that comes with building something that actually works....... just an opinion tho....
My disclosures were far better documented and illustrated than the normal, and I have had very very few requests for clarification. They just took my stuff, added about 2 pounds of redundant description that was, to me, pretty damn incomprehinsible, and submitted it to the USPO..... My first submission was the only one that has ever been denied.... but , to this day, I can't understand about 2/3 rds of the crap that the patent guy submitted, or the reason for it...... No matter, I still got my patent awards, and I don't really care if the next guy that reads it understood it or not --- he could always call me up for the real scoop.....
Patents are things you hang on an " I love ME" wall to stare at when you get depressed, or to send Xerox copies to Mom and Dad to show them that you turned out OK in spite of their accusations of being the Anti-Christ in your teenage years......
Other than that, and maybe a few monetary rewards (if you are very lucky and some manager doesn't get them instead), I've found that patents don't mean much. I even stopped putting reference to them on my resumes.... It seems that hiring managers and HR weenies don't know a damn thing about it, and it makes the applicant look like an egomaniac anyway.....
So, my grandchildren may be suitably impressed someday, but I doubt that anyone else, except myself, will.....
:>))))) Andy