Reason why DC mag field disturbs communications on a train

Filtering on...

NNTP-Posting-Host: {72\\.197\\..}

Preceded by a white-list knocks AlwaysWrong off completely. No Bayesian training required.

...Jim Thompson

That's the problem; while the geek in me loves the idea of using Bayesian filtering, there always seems to be a bog-standard regular filter that does a better job. But hey, why kill a fly with a flyswatter when you can use a .50 caliber sniper rifle? :)

Wrong again, idiot. I have been posting under that nym for well over a year. This one as well, so you can get your bloomers in a bunch all you want, and you will still be retarded, and you will still be wrong, and you will still be a Usenet twit of great magnitude.

If you were any more retarded, I'd swear that you came from the kook group, which is where you belong.

Where your piss and moan complaint will get immediately filed in the round, number 13 bin.

Grow up, retard boy.

That was HIS point, you retarded twit.

HIS filter is by far the 50 cal compared to the lame crap which you think makes you Usenet savvy. You are far from that, and will likely never approach anything that can be associated with intelligence.

No, It is no longer used.. It was never removed.

That sounds more like you, than a piece of pipe.

I feel sorry for any one that has to live with or deal with you. You're a real party hopper.

And for any one interested, removal of the pipe solved the interference problem with the electronics on the train.

are you sure that field's dc, you could have accidentally built a transmitter if the servo loop is long enough

that's bullshit. stuff causes measurable and inconvenient interferance all the time (eg mobile phones, power tools, arc welders, electromagnets...)

not having this pipe conducting flux from the railway will probably help you too.

The 100kHz you mention, is that for the X-ray source or does it come from your electromaget wall?

the 100Khz is coming form the 350KW oscillator tube that generates the AC required in side of a gas pressured vessel where walt Crockcroft multiplier is employed that can yield up to 5Mvolts.

The mag wave sits just behind and below the oscillator cabinet.. I can see where it would be easy for it to intervene.

What the hell is a party hoppper?

Stuff? Jeez, learn how to choose words that support your claim of being intelligent a bit better.

Yes, lots of things cause interference, and nothing is done if no one complains. However, if ONE complaint is filed, they follow up with verification, and resolve, if needed. You are nuts if you think not.

Don't believe me? Just ask Howard Stern. All it took was one complaint and he got severely fined. Should have been knocked out of the industry, but that is another story.

He is telling you that you are worse than I ever could be, and he is right.

"4ax.com" seems to be a major USENET backbone provider and USENET IP (one step back from ISP). Other items in your list are of debatable value as well. The first and last lines stand a chance of producing the same results with the side effect of capturing Phil A as well. .

Macon ain't all that bright. He's the kind of dope that opens up a parked car street side door without looking for traffic first.

You have to love those Cockroft-Walton voltage multipliers; no single component has to withstand the entire output voltage.

Did you know about the trick of using larger capacitors (or same-size capacitors in parallel) in the lower stages to reduce output ripple?

Verification you say? In what way does that differ from him being able to sit back and do nothing until someone verifies that he is interfering and tells him what he is interfering with?.

Leaving aside the vast difference between electromagnetic interference and on-air obscenity, do you imagine that Howard Stern would have been fined just on a single complain without anyone being willing to tell him what he said that they found objectionable? "Yes, Mr. Stern; someone complained about you. No, we won't tell you what you did wrong, or when you did it. No, you will not get a chance to claim that you never said it. No, you will not get a chance to claim that you said it but that it was not obscene. One complaint, no proof, and you get fined with no opportunity to defend yourself." Stern's lawyers would have had the FCC for lunch if they tried pulling a stunt like that. This is still (mostly) a nation of laws and you are still (unless they call you an enemy combatant) innocent until proven guilty.

Perhaps you should stop for a moment, listen to what people are telling you, and consider the possibility that you might be wrong.