Sounds like a parlor trick. With 20:1 concentrator optics, dichroic wavelength splitters, and three different solar cells, it's not going to be economic.
John
Sounds like a parlor trick. With 20:1 concentrator optics, dichroic wavelength splitters, and three different solar cells, it's not going to be economic.
John
Probably not any time soon, but that doesn't mean it's impossible to develop the technology to *make* it cheap. Transistor haven't always cost roughly one
*millionth* of a cent, you know. :-)
Similar breakthroughs are announced several times per week. Not one in ten thousand amounts to anything.
Do you own anything that uses a fuel cell for power? That has been next year's technology for at least 50 years now. I wish people would announce breakthroughs when they start to be practical.
John
Mmm... no.
Understood. I believe the problem is that these days to get funding for research you almost have to resort to hyberpole; just telling someone you're doing pure research that looks promising 20 years down the road doesn't cut it.
Does stock in Ballard Power Systems count?
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
-- "it\'s the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
one
Negative $50 million a year... they'd make more energy by burning dollar bills.
John
consortium led
combined solar
terrestrial
I totally agree with you John - it ain't gunna happen....
Now if we go for a lower overall efficiency (19%) I reckon sliver cells will be far more economical - a 140W panel uses the equivalent of 2 silicon wafers compared to 60 wafers for a conventional solar panel of the same output.
Also can be very thin and flexible.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.