Re: Mike Cranston is now both a chickenshit welching COWARD, and a liar

Well, if Mike hadn't been such a welching coward, he could have come here and found out if I was lying or not, couldn't he?

This is the lamest excuse anyone has ever given for a welchout.

LAMEST EXCUSE EVER.

-- Steve

-- Steve Chaney snipped-for-privacy@NRsmykicktoy.pacbell.net Remove "NRismykicktoy" to get my real email address

"it must shock you that i respect jackie." - John Seiler

See the soc.singles HALL OF STUPID:

"Too late he understood that when you mate with a black widow spider, you're on the menu tonight."

- Crash Street Kidd, re: Jackie, Message-ID:

By forging me NR admits he is my puppet

"Your personal information will continue to be propagated until someone puts an end to your miserable life. The worst is yet to come. Trust me." - Mike Cranston, Message-ID:

"Joan, if you give me your address I'll come kick the shit out of you. Okay?" - Mike Cranston, Message-ID:

ATTENTION, Tammy Chaney! The man who posted your home address and phone number online is known as Michael J Cranston. He has admitted to encouraging people to call and harass you in this post:

He can be reached at Mike Cranston

He has a Washington State Bar ID: 16122 You can look him up online at:

Mike Cranston is guilty of at least three federal offenses so far, and should immediately be reported to the FBI for interstate phone harassment, death threats, and encouraging people to harass you and/or your family.

Here's how to contact the appropriate law enforcement agencies to seek justice:

You usually side with retards. I wonder why that is.

That one always stings.

Yes, I do.

Now now Kim. Exactly where did I make fun of this person? All I did was ask Steve Chaney to give his honest opinion about her SMV. You seem to be even more retardeder than usual today. Why is that? Would it help to knock down a margarita or five?

Ask Steve!

What is the joke? Where is the joke?

You seem to be Steve's friend even after he used Enialle's daughter in a manner far worse than the manner you claim I am using this woman's picture. Why is that?

Rhetorical.

The laws probably vary by state. I'm not interested enough to look it up.

miguel

ps it's happy hour Kim!

It is his address. As required by the Washington state Bar. :)

-- Steve

I don't know. You seem pretty wound up so far as I can tell.

Maybe it's one of the several people whose pictures Steve posted back when he was calling Mindyloo "Parachute Panties?" You do remember those pictures, don't you? Back when he was forging Jackie?

Actually it's not one of those pictures. However, feel free to ask Steve who it is. I'm not going to tell you.

Asking Steve to give his opinion of her is not making fun of her.

Or maybe she poisons dogs. How about that?

LOL. You learned nothing from Jackie or Doctor Dan. Your SMV learning curve is Y=0.

Is that what it was when you and Nil=0 were poking Ledford?

Yes, please do.

And I should feel compelled to respond precisely why?

Why do you think I am asking Steve about her SMV? And why do you think Steve has failed to respond?

What do you think about her SMV?

Did he stop after Crash asked him to? No. Did he stop after Enialle asked him to? No.

Steve stalked Enialle's minor daughter on myspace and posted all sorts of shit about her. A minor girl. A total noncombatant. He persists even after everyone tells him what an asshole he is being, but stops about a few weeks later after he's run out of steam. He didn't stop because anybody asked him to stop. He stopped because he wasn't getting any more mileage out of it.

I post a link to a picture of a woman and ask Steve what he thinks of this woman.

You compare this unfavorably with Steve's behavior.

Could you possibly be any stupider? I don't think so. You haven't learned anything over the years. Every time you jump to Steve's defense, you find yourself defending the indefensible. Yet you still do it, like the proverbial flat-nosed polish dog chasing a parked car.

You are a complete idiot, Kim.

LOL. See above.

Yes, you and George W. Bush have a lot in common in that respect.

What do you think of the SMV of this person?

WELL?

Yes but did I ever say "I'm coming to Monrovia to meet you"? No. Did I post anything other than publicly posted and available stuff? No. Did I claim to call ... er, ROTFLMAO!! did I ever claim my "spies" called around and asked about her? No.

On the other hand you posted the name and address of a total noncombatant - Tammy Chaney - and OPENLY called for her to be harassed over the phone. Something else I haven't done to Ondrea or her family. You've done SO MUCH MORE real lifing than me in that comparison.

-- Steve

-- Steve Chaney snipped-for-privacy@NRsmykicktoy.pacbell.net Remove "NRismykicktoy" to get my real email address

"it must shock you that i respect jackie." - John Seiler

See the soc.singles HALL OF STUPID:

"Too late he understood that when you mate with a black widow spider, you're on the menu tonight."

- Crash Street Kidd, re: Jackie, Message-ID:

By forging me NR admits he is my puppet

"Your personal information will continue to be propagated until someone puts an end to your miserable life. The worst is yet to come. Trust me." - Mike Cranston, Message-ID:

"Joan, if you give me your address I'll come kick the shit out of you. Okay?" - Mike Cranston, Message-ID:

ATTENTION, Tammy Chaney! The man who posted your home address and phone number online is known as Michael J Cranston. He has admitted to encouraging people to call and harass you in this post:

He can be reached at Mike Cranston

He has a Washington State Bar ID: 16122 You can look him up online at:

Mike Cranston is guilty of at least three federal offenses so far, and should immediately be reported to the FBI for interstate phone harassment, death threats, and encouraging people to harass you and/or your family.

Here's how to contact the appropriate law enforcement agencies to seek justice:

Manbreast:

You agree with my characterization of your behavior. Take note of that kimkunt.

Everything that follows your admission of "yes" is utterly irrelevant to kimkunt's point and my response.

You stalked a 16 year old girl on myspace like some pedo freak. Maybe MSNBC will be doing a show about you soon. Remember when you picked up that third grade boy at the bus stop to take him to "school?"

What's the relevance of this?

What's your opinion of the SMV of this person?

miguel

I see the crasstard has been banging his little head on my kill filter again. I think that's so funny.

You correctly surmised that this was a rhetorical question. Congratulations.

Another retard zinger.

Well then let me refresh your recollection. I kept the pictures, and I've prepared a nice little slideshow for you.

These were all pictures that Steve used while forging Jackie, claiming that Jackie was sexually involved with them or found them sexually desirable.

How do you feel about Steve's use of these women, Kimkunt?

It's no spin at all, you dolt.

Tell that to the 20 or so women Steve used while trying to get back at Jackie.

What you might find desirable or undesirable has negligible effect on the concept of sexual market value. A person with high SMV will be sexually attractive to a high percentage of members of the opposite/appropriate gender. A person with low SMB will be sexually attractive to a low percentage of members of the opposite/appropriate gender.

Being nice to animals, being a good cook, and having a nice smile do not translate into inspiring members of the opposite/appropriate gender to want to jump their bones. They might, however, be relevant to such questions as whether this person would serve as a good pet sitter or whether you might want to attend a dinner party he or she hosted.

As I may have mentioned previously, you are quite stupid.

The interesting thing about this comment is that it follows so closely after your histrionic outrage concerning my posting the picture of some woman who happens to be named Teresa Chaney. Almost immediately following your display of moral outrage over my use of a non-combatant to get at Steve, you bring up another non-combatant -- Leanne -- to get at me.

I'm quite sure you can't even begin to contemplate the hypocritical idiocy of your action. It's almost bewildering how stupid you are.

I'm sure you'll offer some sleazy rationalization about how Leanne was once a player in the soc.wars. What was that, 6 years ago?

Wow.

It means, in AUKtard speak, that you two are slurping each other.

We are here in AUKtard land, you know.

I have done real lifing exactly once, with Tammy Chaney, and I made amends directly to her.

That's my record.

You try to equate that with Steve's history because you are a stupid stupid kunt.

miguel

Why do you think that's so funny? You killfile me and then keep talking about me. I respond, and you find that amusing. That's just plain weird, I think. You're not too bright, I'm guessing.

The usenet special olympics.

He could pay someone to stand next to him. Oh wait, no he couldn't... nevermind.

Not guilty by reason of insanity. Anyone dating Cranston automatically makes that legal saving throw.

BTW it's funny how you have NOTHING to say, as usual, about your buddy's latest round of real lifing and subsequent welching. What's your excuse du jour this time? This should be good. Of course this is typically when you dive back into the hole for a few months in hopes that my challenge to you will be forgotten. What with you being such a phenomenal chickenshit and hypocrite, and all.

-- Steve