Re: Matter waves vs Photon

Jul 12, 2009 3 Replies


> Sam Wormley wrote:


>>> M.Parker wrote:
>>>> For the last few days, I'm confusing a lot about Light.
>>> See:
formatting link

>>
formatting link

>>
>> In this sub-column,
>> what makes Einstein to conclude that Light comes as discrete particles=

=2E


>
>> For those who can't open the web-page here is the extracted portion
>>
>> [Emphasis as in the original]
>> ______
>>
>> In 1905, Albert Einstein provided an explanation of the photoelectric
>> effect, a hitherto troubling experiment that the wave theory of light
>> seemed incapable of explaining. He did so by postulating the existence=
>> of photons, quanta of light energy with particulate qualities.
>>
>> In the photoelectric effect, it was observed that shining a light on
>> certain metals would lead to an electric current in a circuit.
>> Presumably, the light was knocking electrons out of the metal, causing=
>> current to flow. However, it was also observed that while a dim blue
>> light was enough to cause a current, even the strongest, brightest red=
>> light caused no current at all. According to wave theory, the strength=
>> or amplitude of a light wave was in proportion to its brightness: a
>> bright light should have been easily strong enough to create a large
>> current. Yet, oddly, this was not so.
>>
>> Einstein explained this conundrum by postulating that the electrons ca=
n
> receive energy from electromagnetic field only in discrete portions
>> (quanta that were called photons): an amount of energy E that was
>> related to the frequency, f of the light by
>>
>> E =3D h f,
>>
>> where h is Planck's constant (6.626 =D7 10-34 J seconds). Only photons=

of


> a high-enough frequency, (above a certain threshold value) could knock=
>> an electron free. For example, photons of blue light had sufficient
>> energy to free an electron from the metal, but photons of red light di=
d
> not. More intense light above the threshold frequency could release mo=

re


> electrons, but no amount of light below the threshold frequency could
>> release an electron.
>>
>> Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921 for his theory=
>> of the photoelectric effect.
>=20
> Which wave is the photon in? Electric or Magnetic wave?
> And how does it move from one to the other?
>=20
> Mitch Raemsch

If it(photon) is in the both waves.., what's the problem to you?


Again the question will be the same,=20 what makes Richard Feynman to say this line..,


"Light is a new kind of object,unlike anything we have ever seen before"


formatting link
formatting link
__


Cell biology is the only science in which multiplication means the same=20 thing as division.

this line..,

The most important difference of light versus more familiar objects (ping-pong balls), is that the light particles are massless. So, familiar rules (like F =3D ma) give nonsense results.

The only dynamic rule that works, for light as a massless particle (NOT light in a medium, where some charges in the glass/air/whatever are in motion and have mass), is that it always goes full-speed (the speed of light in a vacuum is a SPECIAL speed).

That, alone, makes light a very special case in terms of particles in motion.

The most important difference of light versus more familiar objects (ping-pong balls), is that the light particles are massless. So, familiar rules (like F = ma) give nonsense results.

The only dynamic rule that works, for light as a massless particle (NOT light in a medium, where some charges in the glass/air/whatever are in motion and have mass), is that it always goes full-speed (the speed of light in a vacuum is a SPECIAL speed). =======================================

A: http://tinyurl.com/lv2fl7 B: http://tinyurl.com/njgouh C: http://tinyurl.com/klkfc9 D: http://tinyurl.com/l6lt4g Which is/are the correct image(s) ?

It could be said that light is the ONLY object we have ever seen...

Paul

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required