How do you know when its centered in the hysteresis curve? (capacitive coupling of the primary and the assumption what it will align itself)
It really sounds cheap. We pay more than that alone for the transformer :-(
Currently we are making experiments with non-gapped standard ferrite
=F8rselstegn -
We are using low Vf diode, syncronous rectification was tried by some other guys and was either too complex or did not yield better results.
Regards
Klaus
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
Robert Macy
:
rote:
e:
te:
efficiency
ncreases
ncy increases
max =3D VT/
e max B field
result is a
owerloss, if
/pc45_pc46.pdf
ss at 100kHz,
ttp://www.a...
at low B?
s?- Skjul tekst i anf=F8rselstegn -
oid. We
actor to
ects the
vity
info on
er
A/m no
ubtracts
a roll
/10 any
pretty
ability
ve eddy
d,
ishi,
ame
a
th
n is
an
e
all
'
um
o
ike
as
ut
it
d
e
=F8rselstegn -
Oops, memory is shot: that cost was for the torroid core, unwound. TOTAL cost per interface in 1000 quantities, including PCB area was around $0.87, and under the budgeted $1 [and promised to my client's customer] The design I replaced was created by the client, cost around $3 ea plus required installation labor! to match electrical characteristics to what was being measured - whether high voltage, or low voltage.
regarding how to center
align itself)..." that is first pass solution, NOT the best way to check. Key word there is 'assumption'
Was that design a BAD idea carried out WELLl? Or, a GOOD idea carried out BADLY?
From reading your posts, I know I'm 'preaching to the choir' here, but as intriguing as it is to pursue the BEST approach, keep in mind your performance SPECS. When you meet those specs YOU'RE DONE! Else we'll be here all year. :)
Regards, Robert
T
Tim Williams
Surprisingly, I've observed materials that retain DC bias. I've played around with orthonol before (essentially fancy-pants Si steel, maybe a bit of nickel, plus whatever makes it really high permeability and square loop). Circuit: +/-15V square wave generator at variable frequency, low output resistance (a few ohms), series circuit of 15 ohm current limiting resistor, coupling capacitor (4.7uF electrolytic) and current transformer. Bmax roughly 0.05 to 0.4T in the "drifty" range, on up to saturation obviously (over different test windings and frequencies under test).
Results: by dropping the frequency (to a few kHz for most size windings used), the core saturates symmetrically, resetting flux consistently. When frequency is increased, saturation ceases and flux remains momentarily balanced. Then it visibly drifts back to one side of the B-H curve with a time constant of about 0.5 second. The side it drifts to is fairly random. That it drifts at all suggests a positive feedback mechanism, a "waist" shaped B-H curve even.
Saturation can be induced with a small bias current (such as by loading the cap-coupled end with a 100 ohm resistor to either supply), constituting an amp-turn or so of bias. Around 7mA (less than 0.1 At) was the smallest "nudge" that would move it out of bumping-its-head-against-saturation.
Tim
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.