Re: Happy Flag Day US-ians.

John Larkin wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

He said no such thing.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
Loading thread data ...

d
g

Mueller made a point of saying:

"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that."

formatting link
c-4f7415833129.html

How do you interpret that statement as 'no collusion'?

He also pointed out how the office of the special prosecutor could not legally charge the President - that was up to other branches of governmen t.

"It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view?that too is prohibited."

...

"So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles

under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination ? one way or the other ? about whether th e President committed a crime. That is the office?s final position and we wil l not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President."

Note the use of the words "would not" instead of "could not". Mr Mueller

is very precise. He certainly is no hookah-smoking caterpillar...

John

Reply to
John Robertson

Didn't he know all this two years ago? Why didn't he say so and save us a lot of money?

Mueller was charged with finding collusion with Russians. He found none. So he switched to slurs and innuendo, the best he could do.

Since there was no collusion, there was nothing to obstruct.

A lot of people are screeching because they don't like Trump, or the people who elected him.

Why won't the DOJ investigate the Steele thing, or Uranium One, or Hunter Biden? Why did Hillary get a pass on the server thing?

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

John Larkin wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

48

That is not how it works.

No. He was charged with investigating whether criminal behavior occurred within the Trump election campaign organization.

Where did you get that idea.

Really? Robert Mueller, a battlefield decorated Marine? I do not think so. It was Donald J. Trump whom has been attacking him, and many others he simply puts on his "not on the Trump bandwagon" list.

You keep speaking from a false platform.

No. Folks have always questioned Trump's character. Folks absolutely question both the intelligence and character of any and all of the idiots who were hypnotized by his bullshit to the point where the idiots voted for him.

What are you mumbling about, child?

Wtf are you on about? Talking it up with the Russians in ANY setting other than a formal meeting, fully monitored is a suspect illicit meeting. That's how it is, pal. THAT is what this is about.

Still mumbling about petty bullshit. Did we find any meetings with cold war enemies in those emails? Oh that's right...

Just how did we get those emails again? Wasn't it via some lame treason committing former employee or such?

You really are stupid, John. Hard wired, self retarded timing stupid.

Donald J. Trump was a mobbed up criminal in the seventies and eighties and nineties, and now he is STILL COLLUDING with his 'old buddies' and dipshits like you are too goddamned blind to see an NYC shyster asshole when you look at one. He was buddies with the NYC mob and the NYC Russian mob, which have been around since the sixties.

And his dad was a KK member, and I would not doubt that Donald J. Trump is a closeted member as well.

You need to wake the f*ck up.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

It's hard work being so consistently wrong.

Reply to
krw

3-phase AC power supply, actually an alternator simulator. Sort of a favor for a good customer.

We'll drive a "secondary" winding, up to 30 VRMS.

We'll run power from 50 to 1000 Hz, but we need a lot of bandwidth to close a tight feedback loop around the transformer.

I'd sure rather buy toroids already wound. And I want to go down to 50 Hz, so ferrite is out.

That one is around $70, in the noise on this project.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

No, never have.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

John Larkin wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

You didn't need to mention '100s of kHz then.

I would never have mentioned ferrite if I thought you were actually using it at line frequencies.

You can't beat what they already have off the shelf then.

I thought you were making it do something other than what it was designed for.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

We measured it. That's what we found. I was impressed.

Well, we're driving one "secondary" winding and taking outputs from the other three windings, and running up to a KHz or so, and closing a wideband feedback loop around the transformer. Not on the data sheet. Actually the data sheet kinds warns against this use. WDNNSDS [1]

PM alternators often drive switching shunt regulators, which can make nasty waveforms. We want to simulate the alternator impedance and tolerate whatever wild stuff regulators may do.

[1] we don't need no stinkin' data sheet
--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

I don't get paid for doing electronics, but I do think about it from time t o time.

John Doe doesn't seem to manage even that.

I'm active in the NSW branch of the IEEE - the IEEE has between 2200 and 30

00 memebers in NSW (depending on the time of the year - student members are volatile). I've been editing their newsletter for years, and this year I'm treasurer again (mainly because the guy who had agreed to take on the job ran into a family issue, and couldn't do it). I do other things for them fr om time to time, but nothing all that significant.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.