It may be able to, though I've never tried. There seems to be a program called Cohesion Designer that uses/used a very similar set of description lines to what LTSpice uses. And it wouldn't surprise me to find that various Spice programs which support graphical schematic capture using very similar ways of storing the schematics. But I've no idea, at all.
I could certainly look at a few examples, though. Wouldn't hurt me much to deal with slight differences, if I can identify them.
Regarding the symbol libraries, though, I'm currently not using LTSpice's graphical symbol definitions because I haven't come up with a way of rendering them in ASCII. So I need an ASCII library of parts, anyway. I just support the basic ones, like capacitors, diodes, resistors, coils, transistors, fets, etc. Discretes. IC packages are simply missing, for example, but could be added on a per-need basis.
I think I can work out a method for converting graphical package descriptions into reasonable ASCII if I focus on rectangular images. But that isn't done, yet.
In short, I need some input about prioritizing things and I need to find a way of dealing with the more important/common needs. For now, it's more something to illustrate a concept, with the accident that it also has some modest utility.
Jon