OK, understood.
The point was that, if you take what I believe was John's suggested approach of taking component values from an, e.g., LTspice simulation and just build it, even with perfectly accurate component values the results will be significantly out-of-spec because the simulation didn't include parasitics which are significant up in the UHF frequency range. On the other hand, if you know that due to component values your band edges might shift around
+/-5%, you can just tweak the design to allow for a wider bandwidth, build a prototype, tweak the component values by hand, and then go into production reasonably confident that the thing really will meet spec.The problem of course is that a 430-440MHz filter only has 10MHz bandwidth, so a shift of the upper edge by 2.3% completely removes the actual passband from the intended response.
Without building a prototype or using a simulator that accounts for most of the parasitics, I think it's pretty much impossible to end up with the filter being centered at 435MHz.
I tend to use 2% caps, which certainly do command a premium over 5% caps, but it's still nothing compared to the labor cost of manual tweaking.
Yeah, I've seen that mentioned on your web page. It seems a shame that it's gone...
The "Larkin" there is Bob Larkin
I'd be quite amused if John's a relative... John's personality seems quite different than Bob's. :-)
Yeah, a decade ago, September 28th, 1997. There's a tribute page to him here:
Wes Hayward is getting up in years as well, but he still manages to make it to various conferences (he lives in Portland these days, spending his spare time hiking around the mountains... lots of cool photos at
---Joel