Position & Orientation measurement help!

I've started my senior project and I'm running into some questions.. What the project is, is a modular device that will need to record the x,y,z displacement from its original location and its orientation (tilt, yaw and roll degrees). I've been searching around and it looks like the orientation can be done with a mixture of gyro sensors and analog output compasses (i think it's called a dinsmore compass). But anyways, what's boggling me is a solution to calcluate the current position. I've read about the accelerometers and it sounds like there's a lot of error involved. And our spec is to have the device measuring for 30mins, at a sample rate of ~30Hz, so I am assuming there can be a lot of error introduced and propagated through time. And I thought of GPS before we got some specs, but due to their slow reading rate that is out of the question. Does anyone know of a good way to measure position other than using accelerometers? or is there a way to perhaps use a three axis accelerometer without much errors, or filtering out errors? Thanks!

Reply to
Keiichi.McGuire
Loading thread data ...

Search on "inertial navigation". Some of the predecessors to GPS - like Loran - may still be around, and mobile phones have a pretty good idea where they are with respect to the local transmitters, not that I've got any idea how you could exploit that.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Reply to
bill.sloman

From basic equations of motion:

s = (at^2)/2

so a = 2s/t^2

If you want 1m error after 30 minutes the offset error you can tolerate in an accelerometer is

2/3.24E6 m/s/s or roughly 0.1uG.

You can buy inertial guidance packages off the shelf and one this good will cost > $100k.

If you can think of a way of resetting your position every few seconds in some way then the accelerometers get a lot more reasonable.

Of course there are other error sources and it gets worse if its moving fast, tilting etc.

Look at NAV420 on

formatting link
- this lloks like a GPS/sensor combination - no idea how much it costs but it may give you ideas.

Have fun.

Michael Kellett

formatting link

Reply to
MK

What's the volume you need to cover? If the volumes are relatively small (cubic meters), you might look at polhemus technologies

formatting link
-- they make motion and orientation tracking systems.

--
Namaste--
Reply to
artie

I'm not exactly sure on the range of volume that will be tracked. We are still waiting for some detailed specs.. Assuming from the range of recording of 30 minutes, it can have a great amount of displacement. But ultimately this device is to be put on like a videocamera, so I guess the MAX would be a person walking in one direction for 30 minuts (1~2 miles?). I'll dig into the inertial guidance and polhemus tech and see what I can dig up.. Thanks so far!

Reply to
Keiichi.McGuire

You can have simple, cheap or accurate. Choose one of these attributes at the cost of the other two.

--
Regards,

Adrian Jansen           adrianjansen at internode dot on dot net
Design Engineer         J & K Micro Systems
Microcomputer solutions for industrial control
Note reply address is invalid, convert address above to machine form.
Reply to
Adrian Jansen

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.