I really don't care that what you claim is 'clear' to you, as your vision is 'clearly' distorted.
Any scientist that claims that a doctor that has published his results in three peer reviewed--allbeit from the start of previous century--journals and on an AMA conference on bulbar polio, is a fraud just because that 'scientist' can't believe the reported results instead of being triggered into trying to see if the results can be replicated--which would be a
*very* easy thing to do--should have his 'scientific' credentials stripped from him due to his clearly anti-scientific attitude.joe