OT: Nuclear waste reprocessing

formatting link

Power Magazine seems to be the sole remaining trade rag of the power industry now that Electrical World is gone, and might be of some interest to some here - good source of news on both nuke and renewable.

Glen

Reply to
Glen Walpert
Loading thread data ...

We did some work on a laser-based isotope separation project somewhere in the northwest, Hanford maybe; I can't remember the project name. The idea was that a laser can ionize specific isotopes and then electrostatically separate them, or something. The project didn't get past pilot stage.

Oh yeah, it was AVLIS.

formatting link

Reply to
John Larkin

Interesting. There was an attempt to commercialize per your link:

"In the largest technology transfer in U.S. government history, in 1994 the AVLIS process was transferred to the United States Enrichment Corporation (now Centrus) for commercialization. However, on 9 June 1999 after a $100 million investment, USEC cancelled its AVLIS program."

Looks like they stuck with centrifuges:

"In October 2015, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a report to Congress which evaluated options to resume U.S.-technology enrichment operations to meet U.S. national security mission needs. The report concluded that Centrus’ AC100 centrifuge technology was “the most technically advanced and lowest-risk option.”[15]"

Whatever the method, getting the transuranic isotopes out of the waste stream and using them as fuel is the only way of reducing the long term hazard of used fuel disposal, which is essential for public acceptance of increased reliance on fission power. Public acceptance is tough; they would generally rather continue with coal, responsible for an estimated

200k to 400k excess deaths per year from lung disease alone (estimates vary widely), plus huge amounts of pollution of air and water, than risk converting to nuclear, responsible for some hundreds of deaths total. Mostly because of Three Mile Island, an accident which killed no one.
formatting link
Reply to
Glen Walpert

It's not just the transuranic elements in the nuclear waste that create long term hazards - admittedly Pu-239 can be used to made atomic bombs which is a particular hazard. The fragments of the U-235 produced by fission are also radioactive

formatting link
Some of them have short half-lives and are very radioative, making them a short term hazard. Others have longer half-lives making them a long term hazard.

Reply to
Anthony William Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.