OT: Momentum Machines Food Prep Robot

Another example of fuzzy thinking. If I can get capital, it means that anyone and everyone can. And if you have not, it is your own fault.

I have a much better grasp of reality than you do. I understand how the world works and how to prosper from it.

Dan

Reply to
dcaster
Loading thread data ...

The time from ordering to delivery is about 5 minutes. But they must have addressed the rate problem. This is from one of the web sites covering thi s.

Vardakostas, a 27-year-old physics graduate from UC Santa Barbara, says the Burgeon can crank out a burger every 16 seconds. It grinds the meat, stamp s out the patty, sends it along a conveyor-belt grill, toasts the buns, squ irts on the condiments, slices and drops in pickles and tomatoes and lettuc e, then pops the finished burger into a bag, all in under five minutes.

And, says Vardakostas, "we're trying to bring it down to a completed burger every 10 seconds."

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

so that I get capital. And I did.

hat economic power were in the hands of somebody who had a better grasp of reality.

nyone and everyone can. And if you have not, it is your own fault.

The proposition that anyone and everyone can accumulate significant capital - something more than the value of a modest house - represents extremely f uzzy thinking. Those of my acquaintances who managed that would have been h ard to emulate, and would have been very hard-pressed to do it twice.

world works and how to prosper from it.

I am aware that you think that you have a very much better grasp of reality than I have. It's a delusion. You posted

"Afghanistan and Germany have about the same Gini."

The Wikipedia table gives both countries roughly the same Gini-index, but a nybody with any grasp of reality would have realised that German numbers ha d some significance and the Afghan numbers had none.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

A 5 minutes cycle time was the target value. That included approximately 30 seconds to punch buttons at the front end, and about

15 seconds to remove the hamburger and inspect it, before moving out of the way. The 5 minute time was set by testing using a simulated vending machine. People would start pounding on the machine after about 2 minutes, so the front was decorated with status lights.

Assembling the sandwich is fairly easy. Cooking the burger is not so easy. I found your quote near the bottom of: Note that the article doesn't say anything about actually cooking the hamburger, just assembling it. If he's using pre-cooked meat, my 40 year old experience says that it's going to taste awful. I don't think he can go from refrigerated to fully cooked in 5 minutes. Besides, he would need either a "browning dish", hot wire toaster, or a natural gas flame thrower to scorch the outside of the patty in order to make it look like it was cooked. He does mention "toasts the bun" but nothing on the actual hamburger cooking time.

Also, I didn't see any refrigeration. I don't recall the exact number, but meat can only sit at room temperature and unrefrigerated for something like a maximum of 30 minutes. Never leave ground beef or any perishable food out at room

As I vaguely recall, since the inside of the machine operated at elevated temperatures, we were limited to about 10-15 minutes at room temperature, even with internal refrigeration.

Partial cooking doesn't work: Is it safe to cook ground beef part way, then store it to use later? No. Partial cooking of food won't kill pathogens, but instead allows them to multiply to the point that they can't be killed by subsequent cooking.

Incidentally, if you need some entertainment value at your next barbeque, try fast cooking a hamburger with something really hot, like a propane or oxyacetylene[1] torch or other open flame. When I've tried it, all the water was instantly vaporized, the meat carbonized, and sometimes the grease caught fire.

Offhand, I think I could probably do better with a pick and place robotic arm to do the cooking on a grill, and the assembly on a conventional counter. At least the grill would be parallel processing instead of serially cooking one burger at a time.

[1] In my college days, I worked on building Rose Floats for the skool. I did mostly electrical: There were no nearby cooking facilities, so I tried to cook a hamburger on a steel pan with an oxyacetylene torch. Instead, I burned a hole in the bottom of the pan. Please do not repeat my mistake.
--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Triple bypass - a man who is back from the dead. Forgive me if I throw out some advice, though you have been surviving since 2001, so you may hardly need it -

vitamin D3 - 5000 a day. - If your blood level is

Reply to
haiticare2011

Since they said they ground the meat and pressed thee patty, I tend to believe they cook the patty. If I were doing the system design, I would use a combination of microwave and convection cooking. Might not work , but it would be worth a shot.

If he's using pre-cooked meat, my 40

I would have the meat refrigerated and not let it get warm until after it is ground.

For entertainment I wuuld try microwaving and then convection cooking. Well I would if we had a convection oven.

They mentioned a conveyor oven. If they made the conveyor wide enough for three or four pattys, it might work.

Reply to
dcaster

anyone and everyone can. And if you have not, it is your own fault.

al - something more than the value of a modest house - represents extremely fuzzy thinking. Those of my acquaintances who managed that would have been hard to emulate, and would have been very hard-pressed to do it twice.

There are a few things that keep most people from doing it. It is not all fun. I spent a year working in Alaska at fair wages and with free room and board. So that gave me about a years salary with no expenses. Then later I built a house while working a regular job. And that took about a year t oo. So when the house was completed, I owned it free and clear. So saved the money I would have spent on mortgage payments and invested it in stocks . Some in kind of risky stocks such as John Fluke and Nuclear Corp of Ameri ca. Fluke is now part of Danaher and Nuclear Corp of America eventually ch anged its name to Nucor. More recently I bought Illunina at $27.82 per shar e. But then it split so my cost is $13.91 a share. I bought some other s tocks that went bust. Most people obsess on loosing money, so buy bonds or mutual funds.

ty than I have. It's a delusion. You posted

anybody with any grasp of reality would have realised that German numbers had some significance and the Afghan numbers had none.

Ah, you are catching on. Gini numbers can be correct ,but still not have a ny significance.

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

Assumption, the mother of all screwups. Since the quote came from the local Mercury News, which has a history of bad science and misquotes, I not take the article at face value. I guess it is a fair assumption that the hamburger was cooked at some point before or during the process.

Have you ever owned and operated a convection oven? Basically, it's a hot air cooker. If you have an SMT desoldering station, you can try using that to reheat your lunch as see what happens. There are many good things about convection ovens (better efficiency, even temp distribution, faster cooking, no carbonization), but keeping them clean and dealing with the evaporated moisture balance the benefits quite nicely. Even worse, as the volatiles condense on the inner surface of the convection oven, air flow become turbulent and cooking time increases.

During the development, someone devices with what I would call cooking with explosives. The hamburger was first injected with water using an array of syringes. The patty was then cooked with a very high power microwave (3 to 5 KW as I vaguely recall) in a sealed chamber. It wasn't the microwaves that did the cooking. It was the boiling water that did the cooking, from the inside. I recall a few impressive steam explosions. This was followed by natural gas searing to seal in the grease (the flavor is in the fat). The resultant patty was very loose and tender, tasted great, and could be cooked quite rapidly. Too bad the process was dangerous and somewhat messy.

Won't work. Adding a full service butcher shop to the local McDonald's is probably a bad idea. The meat arrives pre-ground and refrigerated from the supplier. Once it's thawed, it has to be used almost immediately, or tossed. Cooling it again isn't allowed. Even with continuous cooling, the allowed storage time is something like 2 or 3 days.

Hmmm, none of the photos show how the ground beef is stored or dispensed. My latest guess(tm) is that they use a conventional flame boiler, with a conveyor belt, to cook the hamburgers, and then use their machine to just apply the condiments, buns, and packaging.

The ladyfriend has one. Works nicely and she's a far better cook than me. However, after dinner, I usually get to spend some quality time getting to know the convection oven by removing the encrusted food residue from every surface with sodium hydroxide (Easy-Off). My microwave oven just wipes clean, but the convection oven requires scrubbing and noxious chemicals.

Note that high end production flame broilers and ovens usually include an air convention system mostly to improve efficiency.

Sure. The machine could easily be scaled into something the size of the typical fast food kitchen. For example, Nieco makes a conveyer frame broiler system. Burger King tour: (start at 1:50 for the flame broiler).

I guess if the fast food restaurant only sells hamburgers, such a machine might be useful. However, it does nothing for all the other junk on the menu. I still think a pick and place robot would make more sense because of the versatility. As usual, Japan is ahead of the curve: (6 min) Worth watching just for the future shock value.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

A few weeks ago, one of my friends mistyped my email address when sending me a request for a health status report. The email went to another Jeff, who had recently died. His widow replied indicating that Jeff is dead. To maximize the damage, my friend sent announcements out mutual friends asking them to pray for my soul. Of course, nobody bothered to verify anything by phone or email. Incidentally, this is the 3rd time this has happened in 13 years. I eventually found out what was happening and am still trying to deal with the effects and perform damage control.

Then, this week arrives with this pronouncement: "Lieberman is gone, group is DEAD, no reason to post here" Sigh...

Thanks. I've never looked into life extension and know nothing about it. It will take me a while to read the literature. I should point out that it fails my medical advice sanity test, which is to ignore any advice from people or organizations that have an agenda or product to promote or sell.

My advice is to choose your parents wisely. The problem is that both sides of my family has a history of cardiac related problems. Various family members have tried fighting heredity through diet, exercise, and lifestyle changes, with poor results. At about 60, everyone ends up with a stroke, heart attack, or coronary bypass. I was a bit earlier than most.

What I do mostly is ignore the doctors, avoid fashionable regimes, do my own research, monitor progress, and make my own mistakes. My cardiologist provides sanity checks and the necessary prescriptions. I could probably do more or better, but I'm not interested in living forever. 13 years is considered quite good for a triple bypass, so I must be doing something right. So far the only mistake I've made were taking satins for 9 years. I recently detailed that in alt.internet.wireless:

Nicely done and I hope it works for you.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

at anyone and everyone can. And if you have not, it is your own fault.

ital - something more than the value of a modest house - represents extreme ly fuzzy thinking. Those of my acquaintances who managed that would have be en hard to emulate, and would have been very hard-pressed to do it twice.

l fun. I spent a year working in Alaska at fair wages and with free room a nd board. So that gave me about a years salary with no expenses.

The Australian equivalent was working deep in the outback. Two thirds of th e people who did it came back with enough cash to put a deposit on a house, and the other third came back with a drinking or gambling problem.

out a year too. So when the house was completed, I owned it free and clear . So saved the money I would have spent on mortgage payments and invested it in stocks. Some in kind of risky stocks such as John Fluke and Nuclear C orp of America. Fluke is now part of Danaher and Nuclear Corp of America e ventually changed its name to Nucor. More recently I bought Illunina at $27 .82 per share. But then it split so my cost is $13.91 a share. I bought s ome other stocks that went bust. Most people obsess on loosing money, so buy bonds or mutual funds.

My parents invested in the Australian stock market at the stage in my fathe r's career when most would have been buying a house. He was working at a hi gh-tech job in rural Tasmania, and living in the house that came with the j ob. He and my mother got good advice and followed it ...

lity than I have. It's a delusion. You posted

ut anybody with any grasp of reality would have realised that German number s had some significance and the Afghan numbers had none.

any significance.

They could, but there's quite a lot of evidence that points the other way, of which you are clearly unaware, and blithely intent on ignoring.

Piketty makes the valid point that the Gini-index is a single valued number , and doesn't say anything about the way inequality is distributed. In prac tice, the shape of the top end of the income and wealth distributions is of considerable significance, because it's the governing elite who get to mak e most of the important choices.

The Gini index still does capture a real difference between US and German s ociety - the fat cats at the top end of the income distribution are fatter in the US, and more powerful in adjusting the rules that let them get fatte r yet, at everybody else's expense.

If you choose to be unaware of this, your grasp of reality is defective.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Proper convection ovens offer a cleaning cycle. When I last looked - which is a couple of decades ago - US convection ovens just heated it's internals to 500C, and the condensed volatiles just burnt off.

The European equivalents had "catalytic surfaces" which oxidised the condensed fats and greases at lower (but still pretty high) temperatures.

Googling "self-cleaning oven" got me this

formatting link

which suggests that the "catalytic surfaces" have gotten better since I last looked.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:50:00 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman wrote:

Well, there went the efficiency. The ladyfriends oven didn't have a cleaning cycle. It was strictly disassemble and clean. There was also the lemon and baking soda method, which didn't work when I tried it.

That's much the same as the US flavor of self-cleaning ovens. The basic idea is to oxidize the grease and tar that's holding the mess together. Anything that promotes oxidation I guess is considered a catalyst. What's left is easily cleaned up dust. Natural cleaning?

Thanks, I should take a 2nd look at what's available. However, there's a potential problem. I don't think that burning off the grease with high heat is going to scale to fast-food restaurant size conveyerized flame broilers usually used to cook hamburgers. Heating a huge oven like those in the photos is just not going to work. I'll try to ask how they clean it at the local fast food dispensary, but I'm afraid my Spanish might not be good enough.

Incidentally, I was once wondering why I couldn't just heat the barbeque grill with a propane torch instead of scraping off the crud after a barbeque. Well, it worked, but it also peeled off the chrome. What happened was that the steel under the chrome expanded with the heat, causing the chrome to fall off in flakes. It probably would have worked with an all stainless steel grill, but I don't have one of those.

It also doesn't work with the iron hibachi grill, where the grease gets into the pores in the iron. The grill looks clean, but the next time I try to cook something, it has the taste of whatever I previously incinerated on the grill. That's one reason why they recommend NOT cleaning an iron grill and "curing" or "seasoning" it instead.

Thanks. It's all part of my checkered past. I wish I could claim that I had something to do with the design or the electronics. I didn't. My assigned task was to clean up the human factors and process flow mess created by the design team. Everyone was so concerned with getting it working, that nobody was paying attention to whether it was actually useable. For example, there wasn't room for a coin collector that would accept paper money. The undercarriage collapsed as more modules were added. Defrosting the fridge was almost impossible because the ice froze the module release mechanism. Modular construction was great, but there were no carts to handle the individual modules when removed. The viewing angle of the status lights were too narrow to be seen by anyone standing in line to either side. With all the cutouts and lights in the front of the vending machine, the painting of a giant hamburger looked like an alien crab-like visitor on a flying saucer. Various operations made various noises, all of them undesirable. Opening the front door to receive the hamburger would result in a blast of steam in the face and a soggy burger if one waiting too long, and if the clean cycle had already started. Opening the back door to reload the various food tubes triggered an interlock which caused the timing system to reset. That meant that any burger in process had to be removed from the mechanism before proceeding. The delivery door was too high to be reached by children. As I vaguely recall, I found about 150 such deficiencies. The problem was not fixing them, but rather convincing the various members of the team that they should fix them. I managed to get a few things fixed, but there was no way I could demand so many major changes. It was rather fortunate that the project was terminated prematurely or I would surely have been defenestrated by the other members of the team.

One aspect of the project was rather unusual. There were security leaks all over the project. Everyone knew that Compu-burger was coming. It was decided that it would be helpful if we exaggerated the capabilities of the machine to the known sources of the leaks, in an effort to render the previously leaked information unreliable. I was judged as having the most virulent imagination and soon found myself producing reports, stories, and sketches describing features normally found only in science fiction literature. As far as I could tell, it mostly worked.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:50:00 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman wrote: (...)

I found the manual for a commercial chain flame broiler at: On page 5, it provides instructions for 3 different cleaning intervals. For daily, it's just scrape it clean with a brush and some soapy water. No chemicals allowed. For monthly, add a steam cleaning. Every 3 months, add a lube job on the conveyor belt. Emulating all that in a robotic device is going to be tricky.

Perhaps robotic arms bearing a wire brush and steam hose?

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

all fun. I spent a year working in Alaska at fair wages and with free room and board. So that gave me about a years salary with no expenses.

the people who did it came back with enough cash to put a deposit on a hous e, and the other third came back with a drinking or gambling problem.

The major difference between the Australian outback and Alaska is the weath er. In my case the work was on an air force base, so no liquor tax. But s urprisingly there was not a lot of problems with drinking at the base. In town it was a different story. Kodiak had 13 bars and 13 churches.

her's career when most would have been buying a house. He was working at a high-tech job in rural Tasmania, and living in the house that came with the job. He and my mother got good advice and followed it ...

That was good luck. In general if someone can recognize who gives good advi ce, they do not need the advice.

but anybody with any grasp of reality would have realised that German numb ers had some significance and the Afghan numbers had none.

, of which you are clearly unaware, and blithely intent on ignoring.

I was making the point that the Gini numbers should be ignored. I was well aware that Germany and Afghanistan are very different, yet the Gini number s would have you believe otherwise. I guess I should explain everything in detail. I thought it was obvious to the most casual observer that the two countries were vastly different.

r in

yet, >at everybody else's expense.

In general the rich do not get rich at everybody else's expense. The high speed traders on the stock market make a lot of money, but only a couple of cents per share. On the other hand , the government run lotteries are a re al ripoff taking money from those that can least afford it.

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

t all fun. I spent a year working in Alaska at fair wages and with free ro om and board. So that gave me about a years salary with no expenses.

f the people who did it came back with enough cash to put a deposit on a ho use, and the other third came back with a drinking or gambling problem.

ther. In my case the work was on an air force base, so no liquor tax. But surprisingly there was not a lot of problems with drinking at the base. I n town it was a different story. Kodiak had 13 bars and 13 churches.

ather's career when most would have been buying a house. He was working at a high-tech job in rural Tasmania, and living in the house that came with t he job. He and my mother got good advice and followed it ...

vice, they do not need the advice.

It wasn't all that difficult to recognise that the source of the advice was good in that particular instance.

but anybody with any grasp of reality would have realised that German numb ers had some significance and the Afghan numbers had none.

ay, of which you are clearly unaware, and blithely intent on ignoring.

Really? Adduce the evidence, or at least point to it.

ll aware that Germany and Afghanistan are very different, yet the Gini numb ers would have you believe otherwise. I guess I should explain everything i n detail.

The Gini numbers are just numbers. The Wikipedia table lists a lot of them and I quote it as a convenient source. I was interested in the Germany/Scan dinavia versus US numbers, which was what I was talking about. The fact tha t the table lists a bunch of less reliable numbers for countries that don't collect reliable statistics is unfortunate, but doesn't make the numbers f rom the reliable countries any less reliable.

The fact that the Afghan numbers aren't reliable isn't any kind of argument for ignoring the German, Scandinavian and US numbers.

es were vastly different.

Me too. Otherwise I would have said something to that effect.

an society - the fat cats at the top end of the income distribution are fatter in the US, and more powerful in adjusting the rules that let them get fatt er yet, at everybody else's expense.

The US collects about 30% of the national income in taxes, the UK about 40% France about 50% and Sweden about 54%. The US government doesn't spend eno ugh on it's health system, education or welfare, the UK at least spends eno ugh on the National Health service, France spends more on a better universa l health system, adequate welfare and education, and Sweden spends even mor e on all three.

The low US tax take favours the rich, and disadvantages everybody else. Sin ce Regan came to power, the bulk of US economic growth has flowed to the to p 10% of the income distribution, and the bottom 50% has seen their real in come stagnate.

Inter-generational social mobility is higher in Scandinvia than pretty much everywhere else, while it's lower in the US than in pretty much any other advanced industrial country. In the US the rich are getting richer at every body else's expense, and it's not a situation that's likely to remain uncor rected.

In general the rich do get richer at everybody else's expense. Piketty ment ions the interesting case of university endowment funds, where the richest universities can afford to spend a lot more on buying the best financial ad vice.

Harvard, Yale and Princeton ($30 billion, $20 billion and $15 billion) achi eve a return on capital of about 10%. The average return is about 8.2% and for institutions with less than $100 million the rate drops to 6.2%.

In real life, having a couple of million tucked away means that you can buy up a failing competitor for ten cents on the dollar, even if their problem s were merely temporary

a couple of cents per share. On the other hand , the government run lotteri es are a real ripoff taking money from those that can least afford it.

Lotteries are certainly a rip-off. Sadly, the people that can least afford to gamble are particularly devoted to gambling, and used to spend their mon ey on "the numbers" when that was a service offered by the Mafia.

If people are going to gamble anyway, it makes sense for the government to offer them lotteries. Not all the government's margin on the process will e nd up spent on the electorate, but Pennsylvania's 98% isn't bad.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.