Then you said:
I assume you are being a hyper-stickler because I did not explicitly include a reference (Vo) voltage in my problem statement. Would you be O.K. if I had said instead:
I think everyone else understood this as a given, which did not need to be explicitly stated.
If this still doesn't satisfy you, then just do a Google search for "voltage as a function of time" +"edu" and you will get a ga-zillion hits showing how voltage can be expressed as a time function. Random example from Bucknell Univ.:
No, you're orthogonal.
Rather, I think you need to go back to Kindergarten and learn how not to be a ball-breaker over something that is obvious.