- posted
10 years ago
"Leap Motion": high res 3D motion detection
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Bob,
Neat!
The video here reminds me of a theremin.
That's $70 end-user price, which makes me wonder what the "innards" ( "line laser" plus linear photodiode array? ) would cost if integrated into another product.
I also wonder what effect the technology behind this will have on the touch-screen panel market. Even the full retail $70 sounds like less than the cost for adding resistive or capacitive touch-screen support to, say, an LCD panel.
Frank McKenney
-- "But America is a great, unwieldy Body. Its Progress must be slow. It is like a large Fleet sailing under Convoy. The
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Could be a big hit once they start delivering in volume...
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
On a sunny day (Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:12:44 -0000) it happened "TTman" wrote in :
If it comes with a Linux driver I would buy one :-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Pretty nice item... Thanks.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
I'll bet you could easily write a "Theramin App" for that.
And considering the resolution, it would be quite precise.
I have "pad" apps for my iPad from Moog and Akai and other big names.
Really nice synth apps. The "pads' are similar in operation to the theramin, only 2-D.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
At the bottom of the page:
- The Leap Motion controller works with Leap-enabled software only. Functionality may vary depending on software.
How useful it becomes depends on how widely accepted it is, though.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Its just another Kinect but optimised to recognize fingers. IOW it is a simple infrared webcam. The heavy lifting is probably done by the host CPU.
-- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools...
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
A single webcam would not give you range. Probably 2 webcams?
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
I wonder if the monitor's light is a requirement for it to operate.
Jon
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Not so much to add touch screen, maybe us$ 0.40 at assembly time. Maybe us$ 10 at retail.
Volume baby, volume, > 1E7/year.
?-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
The case appears to be a hard IR-bandpass filter, making that unlikely.
There are some really interesting ideas here about lensless optics:
which lead to addt'l interesting topics. Point being that a lens sums/ redirects many source rays onto one point on the imaging array. That destroys position information. If you don't do that, you can compute position from the image, re-focus after the fact, etc. Neat stuff.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Joseph,
Thanks for the update. I hadn't realized that the extra cost for "touch" had fallen so low.
Frank
-- Is it not fair to ask the technologist, not only to provide arte- facts which work, but also to provide beauty, even in the common
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Maybe
It may not actually be that low, but the volume is at least that high. Every bloody smart phone and tablet; and a bit more.
?-)