Is National getting out of the switched capacitor filter business?

I am designing a system that really needs a switched capacitor filter or ten. For now I have stuck in the Linear ones that are singles in an SO-8. I have been looking for another maker to see if I have other options and have found to my alarm that it appears that Linear is the only source I can trust.

National: The parts can still be found on the web site with google but there seems to be no way to get to them from the main page. This is usually a sign that the company is about to drop the product line.

Maxim: I've been burned too many times by these guys. They make lots more datasheets than actual parts.

TI: These appear to be only second source versions of the National parts.

Does anyone know of another company that I may have missed? I need to kill off something at, lets say 7KHz on a signal at 1KHz and I have clocks from 1KHz to 128KHz. The actual numbers vary over a 5:1 range so a fixed tuning would have to be a way better filter than one I can tune by changing the clock.

Reply to
MooseFET
Loading thread data ...

Whosever you use, be careful about aliasing the signal, aliasing any power supply noise, input charge-injection spikes, and output spikes!

And noise. They tend to be noisy.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

S/C filters have never really caught on, IMHO because they wanted to cram a pricing structure into the market that made these filters unattractive. I am probably one guilty party, having used them on only one design where I had to but not on any others. The sole reason was the high pricing.

Anyhow, personally I trust LTC a lot. The earth would almost have to be hit by a huge meteorite before they discontinue something. Maxim, ahm, well, you've already said all there is to say. Even if they have parts there is never a guarantee that they'll have parts next time the purchasing folks want to order a reel ;-)

Other source, and this might actually save money on some products: Cypress. Many of their PSoC contain several S/C filters, along with other useful analog stuff.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

John Larkin writes

Aha. So it's not just my lousy layout. I only tried using them once, and was stunned by the (power rail) noise. A simple 100nF decoupler to +5V and -5V just didn't cut the mustard.

However, I generally like and trust Linear Tech stuff. The NatSemi filters didn't seem to have devices with such high specs in their lineup, I got the impression they'd perhaps come up with the idea in the first place but Linear Tech had leapfrogged them and NatSemi had stopped developing them years ago; if NatSemi find they are not selling, they may have stopped emphasising them in their main index?

You've listed all the SC manufacturers I know of.

--
Nemo
Reply to
Nemo

Can't confirm that. My one and only design with lots of S/C filters on board was a medical ultrasound Doppler board. There you need in excess of 80dB in dynamic range, and it delivered. But you've go to have at least partial planes for the supply.

[...]
--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

I think I will be changing the whole topology but what I did was: The input of the filter is fed with a fairly simple RC filter from something that should be down by 60db (in theory) by time we get to Nyquist.

The supply is from a linear regulator.

The input side spikes should all end up in the capacitor. The output side fed another simple RC to kill off the steps.

My signal is over 2Vp-p and I only need the noise in the

10Hz either side of the signal to be about 60 dB down.
Reply to
MooseFET

I'd really like to start trusting Cypress again. I will look at the PSoC chips again. Even though I am changing topology I may find something worth a look.

This may even end up as an ASIC. Currently, the entire hand held device will fit in the back of a pick-up truck.

Reply to
MooseFET

Where did they disappoint you in the past?

Oh, the Silverado edition of your design :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

[snip]

Bwahahahaha!

Reminds me of the first mockup of an electronic transmission controller at Ford (~1968)... the "breadboard" filled the trunk of the car :-) ...Jim Thompson

-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at

formatting link
| 1962 | The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy

Reply to
Jim Thompson
[....]

They quite making a part just after I designed it in. I couldn't really get too made at them because it was a CPLD. At this point

100% of the CPLDs I have ever designed in have gone out of production. Two of the companies have gone completely out of the business. A great example is that I designed in the 5V Coolrunners from Philips.

Do they come with a 2nd battery option? I have met the design goal that it run on a single battery. A 100 AH deep cycle isn't quite what marketing had in mind but they are just a bunch of whiners.

Marketing didn't like my proposed name. I wanted to call it the Hindenburg-Titanic Jr and give it the part number

13-444-666.[*] The didn't like that either. What a bunch of whiners. [*] Ask someone from China about the number 4. In one dialect 4 sounds like the word for death.
Reply to
MooseFET

Programmables are notorious for vanishing. That's why I avoid them as far as possible. Once I almost designed in the Intel series. Man was I glad that I didn't because two years later ... poof.

No idea (probably not as a factory option) but the guys with campers on there usually have an additional deep-cycle.

AFAIK the abbreviation "SMT" sounds like death in Czech, I believe it's "smrt" in their language. They are pretty frugal when it comes to vowels :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

It is that way in Korean. For that reason, Koreans think of number 4 as a symbol of bad luck.

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

I have heard tell that they regard "R" as a vowel.

-- "Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it." (Stephen Leacock)

Reply to
Fred Abse

On Mar 20, 6:02=A0pm, Joerg wrote: [....]

Things like PICs and 8051s seem to stay around for a while. CPLDs seem to only go away if I design them in. What was the Intel part IIRC a while back I did design something from them into a product too.

I have been thinking that perhaps I should charge companies to not design in their parts.

In my latest design, I have several micros and no CPLDs or even

22V10s. I like the CMOS zero power 22V10s even thought they are kind of slow, they can be used to make about 5 ICs worth of logic per package.

I am using a lot of 74HCxx logic in the design in an effort to keep the power low. One part needs an oven so there are limits on what I can do with circuit design. I really kind of wish that the LT1352's supply current didn't rise so much when you slew them hard. I have had to reduce amplitudes and move to a slower op-amp in one place.

[....]

Seriously: Some folks want to go with some 3 AH Lithiums. Do you have experience with this technology. It worries me that just a little abuse can turn a Lithium into a rocket motor.

Reply to
MooseFET

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.