help with navtex/medium wave receiver sensitivity and decoding

Feb 12, 2007 25 Replies

No. Only the nulls are sharp. You can just mix the signals.

. . . . . . . .

Actually accurately placed high loaded Q (over 100, can use up to 1000) in the RF section will actually help this mode (50 baud fsk 170 Hz shift).

JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.   --Schiller

Perhaps an old analog PLL would clean up the signal for further processing in teh digital world.

JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.   --Schiller

Thats an interesting idea...I would need a slow moving error loop to avoid pulling it all over the place. Unfortunately at an IF of 6kHz and a 100baud Ive only for 60 cycles in which to lock and recognise a particular frequency, but perhaps more like 20 cycles to allow for reasonable edge detection between a logic 1 and zero. If i were using a to part conversion it would be a neat solution and I'd have a higher

1st IF to minimise images.

I'm trying to resist putting a very tight filter on the front end as I would like to be able to choose between 518kHz and 490kHz, although practically this may be a reason why a certain commercial low end receiver I tried (which is also dual channel) was so hit and miss.

For US use, only 518 kHz is used. If you use really high q filters (200 or more) dual filters is most appropriate. Cheap units cannot afford to do this. The distance between the two "carrier" frequencies is way too far for single high Q rf tuned circuits. Multiple high Q tuned circuits works a lot like combined AM and FM IF strips.

JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.   --Schiller

I'm in Great Britain...and theres some useful local weather forcast information on 490kHz. I have to do some research on filters. Many thanks for your time with this Joseph

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required