Are you sure there won't be trouble Win, at high load currents, where Vgs approaches 0v, therefore reducing the zener current towards 0mA. It has a sniff of maybe an uncertain operating point.
A 1mA bleed from the 520V won't hurt surely. I've added it back in for you. :)
Thanks; it has been so long since i have worked with those
4-pin,5-pin and octal devices that i forgot. Now i remember; ground the plate, signal goes in at the plate, and power at F/2 is pulled out from the grid.. (hint..tetrode)
That's a favorite of mine, I bought 100 a while back for use in one of my HV amplifier designs. But what I liked most was its small die, and the resulting low capacitance. So while it has a hefty voltage rating, the small die means it doesn't have a hefty power capability. Compare its high 2.3 C/W thermal resistance (allowing only 54W max for 25C case) to 0.24 C/W (417W) for the FCH47n60 I mentioned yesterday. That's a factor of 10x in the thermal resistance, which after factoring in the thermal resistance of the heat-sink insulator pads, etc., can lead to a 4 to 5x poorer maximum current rating for the regulator.
One comment from experience, high-voltage zeners have rather high temperature coefficients. This leads to a much larger problem than dynamic impedance, so substantially reducing the zener current, say to 0.1mA rather than 1mA, could help. Or perhaps better yet, change the zener voltage to the 6-volt region, where the tempco is close to zero. But, this would reduce the loop gain with the high feedback attenuation, so better yet, change to a TL431 active zener control chip.
One comment from experience, high-voltage zeners have rather high temperature coefficients. This leads to a much larger problem than dynamic impedance, so substantially reducing the zener current, say to 0.1mA rather than 1mA, could help. Or perhaps better yet, change the zener voltage to the 6-volt region, where the tempco is close to zero. But, this would reduce the loop gain with the high feedback attenuation, so better yet, change to a TL431 active zener control chip.
One comment from experience, high-voltage zeners have rather high temperature coefficients. This leads to a much larger problem than dynamic impedance, so substantially reducing the zener current, say to 0.1mA rather than 1mA, could help. Or perhaps better yet, change the zener voltage to the 6-volt region, where the tempco is close to zero. But, this would reduce the loop gain with the high feedback attenuation, so better yet, change to a TL431 active zener control chip.
One comment from experience, high-voltage zeners have rather high temperature coefficients. This leads to a much larger problem than dynamic impedance, so substantially reducing the zener current, say to 0.1mA rather than 1mA, could help. Or perhaps better yet, change the zener voltage to the 6-volt region, where the tempco is close to zero. But, this would reduce the loop gain with the high feedback attenuation, so better yet, change to a TL431 active zener control chip.
Now how am I going to get out of this situation? Telling the truth and admitting that I actually have two copies of AoE -- my own at home, and another one at my office but haven't really worked through them? Or should I just say, thanks for the hint, I'll go and buy the book (making Win happy about yet another sale of a 2nd edition copy so he can stall the 3rd a bit more)? Or should I just shut up, stick my nose in the book and then decide where the three foldback resistors need to go in the circuit that's being discussed here? I guess the latter is what I'll do. Thanks.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.