Hi Guys, I'm trying to duplicate the smd pcb that's about 1/4 down on this page.
formatting link
See the RF Probe 952001B pcb. I suspect the underside is solid groundplane, but I don't know this. Is there any reason it wouldn't be?
Also, 2/3 of the page down, you will see a schematic drawing of a 100 to
1 voltage divider. It is a capacitive divider. Any idea about the values used in the divider?
Here is a model useful from 50kHz to 250MHz.
formatting link
Thanks, Mikek
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
A
amdx
I'm surprised, I got know one's opinion. The probe is good up to 1.2 GHz, I don't expect mine to be that good, but I'm trying to do well. I ordered thick film SMD's resistors, because of price and availability. Is there a better choice for resistors at a GHz?
Mikek
T
Tim Williams
Strange, something on that page is crashing my Chrome.
Oh hell... looking at the source, it contains NO CLOSING TAGS. I wonder if Chrome might be stack-overflowing or something?
It's also HTML 3.2? Was that *valid* back then?! (Checking, I guess it was!) Holy hell, how long has this website been up for?!
Doubt that is the cause. html5 doesn't require an end tag on .
Yes, it was probably more valid then.
J
jurb6006
Is there any reason it wouldn't be? "
Yes. Why create all that capacitance ? Most likely a simple single sided board. Actually using SMDs there is less inductance floating all over the place and no holes to drill.
I say it would be a waste of copper and process.
A
amdx
Thanks for the input. Mikek
D
Dimitrij Klingbeil
Most likely no full ground plane (see jurb's post for reasons).
Other similar probes may have some partial ground planes or shielding traces. The RF front end (where the diodes are) should be free from ground plane capacitances however.
Here's a picture of the inside of another such probe, rated 100kHz to
1.2GHz. It's not from Bontoon, but Tonghui and belongs to a TH2268 type millivoltmeter. The construction is a little simpler and the output is asymmetric (goes to a BNC), but the working principle is more or less the same. It's also housed in an aluminum tube, only that the front end has a smaller diameter. It does work at 1GHz, but I don't have a reference meter to reliably check the calibration up there.
formatting link
As you see, there's some rather myopic board edge cutting, but it seems to have just enough ground trace left to still work. They decided to put a shield trace right under the first resistors, then again under the second one, probably to keep the RF out of the DC path. That's easily done with through-hole parts, but could be done with 1206 size SMD resistors too if needed.
Regards Dimitrij
A
amdx
I ended up removing the ground plane under the diodes and the first resistors and left it for everything else. Waiting for my parts to arrive. Thanks, Mikek
J
Jan Panteltje
On a sunny day (Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:59:47 +0100) it happened "Dimitrij Klingbeil" wrote in :
Mine is even simpler, tested to several GHz:
formatting link
A
amdx
Somehow I deleted Jorge's message, so I can't respond to it. Here's mine, unbuilt, untested, waiting for parts. I have since redesigned the pcb to get rid of the 1/2in of wire One more sleeve of heatshrink, over BNC, but installed so tip can be
removed. Note: I artificially added part layout and cable using Paint.
I think the input to my Boonton is differential? So it takes two plus ground at the probe output.
I expect to drill a small hole on each side of copper tube so I can solder ground on PCB to copper pipe.
Then I need to find someone to test and calibrate. I'll see what my local state college has to help. Want do it on the cheap.
btw. I layed out a pcb and tried the printed page ironed on to copper and I couldn't get the toner to stay on the copper. I have special paper, but I think my toner cartridge is on empty or the paper is just to old. I've done it many times, tried twice just didn't stick. I ended up exacto knifing the whole thing.
Mikek
Mikek
D
David Platt
Several things to note:
- You need to get the copper really clean... and micro-roughening it helps. Scrubbing with a green abrasive pad helps. Scouring powder helps, if rinsed very thoroughly. Dipping briefly in etchant and then immediately rinsing helps.
- Reportedly, Brother printers don't work well for this... something about the toner formulation. Classic HP printers work pretty well.
I've done a few this way. Next one I do, I'm going to laserprint on a transparency and use presensitized copperclad and a fluorescent light, and see how that process works.
A
amdx
I did use the green abrasive pad, didn't do an etchant dip.
Well, I do have a Brothers printer, but I have made many boards on it. My toner cartridge is a refill, and it has been long enough since I made boards that I don't remember if I always used refills or new cartridges for boards.
I used Expresspcb as my cad program. Anyone know how to copy and past a board? I'd like to put 10 circuits on one board. Mikek
Y
YD
Never mind special paper. I've found that the kind they print supermarket fliers on works well. Just make sure it's glossy or semi-glossy. Print right over the ink, it won't come off. Soak in hot soapy water for a while and peel it off. Some experimentation will be needed.
- YD.
A
amdx
Here's mine, unbuilt, untested, waiting for parts.
I have since redesigned the pcb to get rid of the 1/2 in of wire One more sleeve of heatshrink, over BNC, but installed so tip can be removed. Note: I artificially added part layout and cable using Paint.
I think the input to my Boonton is differential? So it takes two plus ground at the probe output.
I expect to drill a small hole on each side of copper tube so I can solder ground on PCB to copper pipe.
Mikek
C
Clifford Heath
Maybe you didn't apply enough heat? I use a hotted-up laminator, and it still needs 3 passes.
A friend imports his ExpressPCB designs into Robot Room Copper Connection to make Gerbers. If you take that path, there's a variety of Gerber tools that could help.
Clifford Heath.
F
Fred Abse
There are some suspiciously stripline-looking things in there...
"Design is the reverse of analysis"
(R.D. Middlebrook)
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.