"Two thoughts diverged in a yellow wood, ... and I completely missed the boat."
-- attr Robert "The Snowman" Frosty
Sorry, Joerg. I've been irritated about the general employment numbers for the whole country ( "H-0"? ) and was looking for a replacement -- and hopefully more appropriate -- set of numbers. I managed to miss your focus on the H-1B segment ( yes, in spite of the Subject line ). Oops. Mea culpa.
Ah. So you want "present state" rather than "change". Okay.
Are "prevailing wage" numbers available from some public source?
Again, when I wrote this I was looking for numbers representing "State of The U.S. Economy, Subcategory Employment" rather than just the H-1B segment. Not disagreeing, just explaining why these seemed like they might be useful to me -- but not necessarily to you.
Hm. I'm not familiar enough with H-1B hires to comment, but I can ask: Do companies employing H-1B applicants, do they pay transportation and possibly housing allowances? That is, are H-1B hires at the same salaries as U.S. citizens already more expensive in terms of non-salary costs?
"That depends on what the meaning of 'is' is." (Unknown?)
I think that a desire to "fix the problem" exists, but there is some disagreement on what "the problem" might be.
Imposing an "imported labor tariff" would tend to reduce the problem of salaries of American citizens being depressed by external competition. On the other hand -- from the employer's viewpoint -- it would make it harder to reduce labor costs, thus keeping the company's expenses -- and the costs of whatever goods and services it provides
-- higher, and thus less competitive.
Which, I'm sure, would call for the creation of a Bureau of Labor Cost Adjustment whose purpose would turn out to be that of ensuring that all United States jobs received a "fair" wage ( but you'd have to vote for the bill to find out what "fair" meant ).
Sigh.
Frank