Grr! The worst assumptions....

I was the perp's system-integrator and software guy on one of those, but it was a 144-pin PLCC that he mirrored. Fortunately not me -- but I've done smaller ones in my time.

--
Tim Wescott 
Control systems, embedded software and circuit design 
I'm looking for work!  See my website if you're interested 
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply to
Tim Wescott
Loading thread data ...

That's actually a good reason to be an analog designer -- fewer pins to swizzle when you screw up a package!!

--
Tim Wescott 
Control systems, embedded software and circuit design 
I'm looking for work!  See my website if you're interested 
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply to
Tim Wescott

Yes, I've kludged it, and any I intended to get the board made by a fabricator once it's finalised, since I find they're less likely to develop dry joints. Still, it annoys.

Sylvia.

Reply to
Sylvia Else

That's the WiFi antenna.

Reply to
krw

Always triple-check the package. I do, and I still screw things up from time to time.

--
Tim Wescott 
Control systems, embedded software and circuit design 
I'm looking for work!  See my website if you're interested 
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply to
Tim Wescott

The 22pin 0.3in package was a late innovation called a skinny-dip. Showed up late for (mainly) memory or programmable logic.

Conventional 22pin is 0.4in.

There should be a mech dwg on the spec sheet, or a page of drawings in the print catalog. One of the shortcomings of data sheets that were digitized from print.

RL

RL

Reply to
legg

Is that .031" thick PCB?

Do you hand-solder or reflow it?

We have an obsolete +5V Altera CPLD that we are considering that method but it's a 68-pin QFP footprint.

Thanks,

Reply to
papabear546

Is that the comparator with diodes across the input?

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Reply to
pcdhobbs

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.