Is this frequency plan viable.
Frequncy generator
May 03, 2007
4 Replies
formatting link
formatting link
oops
I would say not.
The 40Hz comparison frequency is too low. That's going to force you to use a very low loop bandwidth, which will make it slow to lock.
You'd probably need to convert the mixer inputs to sine waves first; and it'll produce sum and difference products, so you'd need a good low pass filter to remove the 10.4-13 MHz sum product whilst passing the .4-4 MHz difference. Finally, you'd need to square-up the sine waves again before feeding them to the dividers.
If the aim is to produce low frequencies with high resolution, how about a DDS?
If you want a PLL with small steps, consider Fractional-N.
That is a concern. Once locked the loop filter can be slow, and I had thought to use a lock detect circuit to change the current of the detector for speeding up lock time.
Had a D FF in mind for that part, only the difference out.
Had a brief look, still reading.
Will research. Thanks.
Only if you can tolerate immense amounts of phase noise.
This sort of thing looks ideal for a cheap DDS chip. I'd maybe double the clock first, to 20 MHz, to not run too close to Nyquist.
John
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required