Then stop talkning about it.
Only a few persons in this newsgroup have ever complained about it and as I already has pointet out, it is not common to follow this standard.
I am looking forward to an HTML example that will render the background with different contrast on different browsers. An remember we are talking about "bad code", not code written to do it.
Just as possitive as JeffM posted (Hint: Look at the heading, it is a very positive attitude).
A US Congressman evaluates his mail this way:
1 letter bitching about somethng equates to 1000 people who are just as concerned, but didn't write.
You are an ignorant little prick, Is there anything you dont know?
It only takes one person, pissed off by all this mucking about and who happens to be on the end of an internet connection that won't support a 1000kB download to crack the time limit and then *no one* would visit your webpage at all.
OK so development of newer versions would stop but by then who cares?
And?
Probably most users of the program.
I belive he has some other goals that I do.
I don't know what your problem is.
Bye. Jasen
The other problem is that if the software is only good for 6 months and there's somthing like 1 in 100 probability that after 6 months there'll be no replacement available.
That you ignorance shining through. How old are you Jasen?
Thats is a very good reliability. Think about programs that depends on connection to a specific internet site and what about all the stuff on internet we use.
Only AV software and anti-spyware programs do that...
I'm seeing more and more software where the "Help" link takes you off to an Internet site, which seems a little ironic in that when you need help the most it may well be when you're without an Internet connection and therefore can't, e.g., Google your problem...
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required