Drag race Xmas tree project continued.

Continuing the saga of my drag racing Christmas lights project, I have another question.

Since the race is to be held in an abandoned air strip an hour's drive out of town, mains power is probably not reliable there, and I don't want to depend on a portable generator either. So I thought I'd design everything to use batteries for this event - a

12V truck battery for the lights.

LEDs would be efficient but I won't be able to get readymade LED-array lamps in time - another restriction due to my location. And I want to avoid the addititonal workload of manually assembling 14 lamps of several dozen LEDs each and having to improvise reliable mechanical holders for them. So I thought I'd use incandescent automobile light bulbs for the lights.

I've finished a tentative design of the entire timing, sensing and control unit, using MOSFETs to drive the lamps (Relays would introduce additional delays when times will be measured in small fractions of a second. Unless a better idea comes up, I'll just have to accept the turn-on delay of the incandescent lamps as unavoidable).

The actual wire lengths from the control unit to the lamps will be 2-3 dozen feet. At first, I thought I'd avoid having to run more than a dozen thick gauge wires over that distance by placing the MOSFETs near the lamps and use a cable of thinner wires to send the gate drives. But I've had second thoughts and this is what my question is about: Will cable capacitance, inductance and cross-coupling pose problems with that scheme? Thanks in advance.

Reply to
pimpom
Loading thread data ...

Ghetto style: A piece of plywood,

4 nails, A strip of spring steel, and the mechanics from a microwave dish spinner. Use inverter between battery and motor.

Isn't all that matters is premature start and distance time.?? The tree lights can be doing random timing. When the Go light lights...it means go and that can happen at any time. Atomic timing not required.

Unless it's standard that the 'Go' light is predicted by rhythm. Tap ...tap ...tap ... press gas! I suppose without rhythm and the race is part machine performance and part eye/foot response time.

Reply to
D from BC

This is a professional contract between the race organisers and me. An amateurish lash up has to be avoided as far as possible.

That's just it. It's entirely based on rhythm. Pros time their reaction and skill at anticipating the moment of 'Go' to the millisecond - literally. This is partly why I intend to change the lights to LEDs after this race. I'm using a crystal oscillator for the countdown timer and false starts will be detected to within a millisecond.

Anyway, my concern is not about possible loss of timing precision. It's about cross-coupling causing unwanted switching and cable reactance causing instability and slow turn-on, with consequent over-dissipation of the MOSFETs.

Reply to
pimpom

On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:57:20 +0530) it happened "pimpom" wrote in :

Why not use optocouplers at the MOSFET side?

opto coupler

--- R1 -- ---------------------------+ | | | --- |/ | \\ / / -| BULB --- |\\/ | | | | |--- _________| |_____________| |

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

??? Huh I dunno but this doesn't seem like the type of project to have that type of problem. Wouldn't the only cable going to the tree be a pair of wires to a single 'start sequence' button? Battery and all control electronics are on the tree.

Reply to
D from BC

No. It's not just a visual countdown system. The lights are linked with four optical sensors to detect and indicate correct positioning of the racers before the start and also unambiguously indicate a false start.

In addition to driving the lights, the control unit has to drive four pulsed IR LEDs and receive inputs from four IR receivers. The IR emitters have to be located directly in between the racers' starting position, the receivers on each side of the tracks at least 15 ft from the middle. The lights have to be some distance in front of the racers. All of this means a lot of wires going in and out of the main box. The start and reset buttons can be anywhere within a reasonable distance.

Reply to
pimpom

I would use a low value R at gate-source on the FETs, something close to the characteristic impedance of the cable, if you know that. Something around 200-500 ohms would seem appropriate. Delays caused by cable capacitance & inductance should not be an issue for your timing resolution. I did a project for a Christmas light show years ago and had success driving gates from 300 feet. I think you're going to be far removed from any source of external interference, so anything that gets you will probably be of your own making. I'd also suggest a TVS on the gates.

On your problem of timing... could you not measure the on-time of the headlights and build in a delay so the timing start trigger occurs at a point where the lights become visible? I know you said you've already finished the design so maybe this suggestion is not feasible now.

Reply to
Wingsy

Thanks for the reply. It's reassuring to know about your successful experience. The distance I'll be working with will be about a tenth of yours. Switching speed is the one factor that's not crucial here - even a 100 µsec rise time shouldn't be a problem as far as timing resolution is concerned. As there won't be time for a major redesign, I was being extra careful in case someone could anticipate a problem I hadn't thought of.

That's a thought, and the design is not set in stone. But with the limited time remaining before the race, I'd like to avoid introducing anything but minor changes unless something makes it imperative. I'm working on the pcb design right now. For this particular event, I have to work with materials that I can quickly collect. For later races, I'm thinking of using triacs to switch readymade mains-voltage LED lamps, coupled to the control circuitry via optoisolators.

Reply to
pimpom

"Wingsy" schreef in bericht news:291120090525008823% snipped-for-privacy@nowhere.com...

I'd be carefull with that assumption. He's got high performance race cars idling just a couple of feet away from his electronics. Their design criteria might not include EMC guidelines!

Antoon

Reply to
Antoon

Not worth the candle, by using the same type bulb it will be very nearly equal over all the bulbs and not disturb the rhythm.

Reply to
JosephKK

That might turn into a step backwards. Look into just how mains supply LED lamps work, there is a little SMPS in there.

Reply to
JosephKK

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.