IIRC that only worked on film stock
martin
IIRC that only worked on film stock
martin
I later had some kind of strobe, power unit about the same size as a small laptop, vibrator driven inversion from batteries, IIRC around
100W-sec?...Jim Thompson
The one in part 15 that prohibits interfering with electronic equipment.
Thanks, Rich
Nothing in the above post limits the method to RF or EMP. Much of this thread has been about optical methods, which I suspect to be how the lightning bolt interfered with the camera on MythBusters.
I don't think that part 15 prohibits an infrared source that interferes with an autofocusing camera.
It is absolutely feasible!
Marc Popek
Most modern electronics are remarkably resistant against electromagnetic disturbances (EMC requirements) I once tried to silence a diskman by holding the antenna of a 5 Watt VHF radio onto it, no effect whatsoever.
If you use sufficient power, you may upset one of the paparazzies pacemakers or fry their expensive electronics.
Wim
I once found out the hard way that running 5A through the metal tab directly under a chip does wild things ;-)
...Jim Thompson
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required