Dealing with abusive multiple posts

SuperM wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Paul, It's still happening, but it's filtered at the server end. The few that slip through are making it through clever wording in the subject line.

It may be against you TOS.. but that's really beside the point. To successfully cancel a post, you'd have to contact *all* of the nsp providers and gain their cooperation. Once a post propogates, it's out there.. for the world and beyond to see.

You can mash on that cancel button till the cows come home.. The next best thing you can do -if you don't want your stuff archived, is to put 'X-no-archive: yes' in your headers. That way, google won't archive your words of wisdom for the ages. Of course, that has absolutely no effect on the numerous other services that attempt to archive posts.

HTH

I doubt that there is any possible email system system that is less effective than what is in current use. I get spam with no sender name or domain name. That couldn't happen with a send/challenge/accept/receive system because the initial send couldn't be challenged, and would be dropped. It would also stop any forged headers. The receiving mail servers could also be configured to refuse mail from any sending mail server without a valid abuse@ address.

Or even Google, is someone replies to your post and fully quotes it. In the case where there is only one replier, and he edits your "quoted" original in an unfriendly way, you might with you had kept the original in the archive.

But the bureaucracy and enforcement effort would chip away at even more of our freedoms.

Thanks, Rich

Richard Henry wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

out

archived,

This is very true. I've been able to find some of my pre-blu posts that way. Once you've put it out there, it's out there.

Paul E. Schoen wrote:

Apparently only if you use Internet Exploder. That page was constructed by a moron.

Here is the content without the black-on-dark-gray idiocy (which you will see if you use a Gecko browser).

What ARE you like?

First you bombastically claim it can't be done, then when corrected try to suggest you knew it could but it's against ISP" TOS.

Now you pretend you know all about it.

The fact is ANYONE can cancel your wretched nonsense any time they feel like it.

i.e. you were plain wrong as per usual.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC), blu Gave us:

That's what *he* said. It usually scared the girls too... It was massive.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:40:05 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright Gave us:

You can't cancel my post. There are enough servers out there that ignore your crap, that is will remain.

And it will still be there. Are you getting it yet, boy?

Try it, you won't succeed.

Much as it may hurt your pride they will not be available on any news server or archive that honors cancels.

Try searching for a cancelled message ID.

pick any one from control.cancel and see what happens.

Why should I want to that?

Crushing free speech and self-expression is the practice of netKKKops such as yourself. So many filter you out you are virtually invisible anyway,which is why you change your nyms.

Brandon D Cartwright wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Brandon: You're saying it's possible to cancel posts, correct? OK then. I will not whine, cry, go snivelling to your ISP/NSP, nor will I do anything but say "Kudos- well done" if you're able to cancel this post. It's a very curious thing.. I'd love to see it happen.

Rogue canceling is serious shit that I totally disapprove of.

Even though you might not report your post being cancelled ,sniveling sneaks and stool pigeons and toads such as Prongboi certainly would.

Maybe someone else will cancel it.

Brandon D Cartwright wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

As do I. I'm just curious if it can be done in the year 2007. It's been done to death, but it seems like that was another age.

You're right to cover your ass. I understand.

Maybe. I really don't think it can be done. We'll see.

Not Found

The requested message, Xns991C48A07CB34utb@207.14.116.130, could not be found.

You can visit the main page.

Brandon D Cartwright wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

If

compromise

There

have

for

so

corrected

that

they

is

been

,sniveling

I don't let google archive. Maybe they're actually practicing that option for once.

I could. But, like I just posted to you in some other post: blu wrote in news:Xns991C633A04F09utb@207.14.116.130:

from giganews.

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:45:27 +0000 (UTC), blu Gave us:

You're the one that said "once you put it out there, it's out there."

What... were you talking about your snatch?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:13 +0000 (UTC), blu Gave us:

He's a wuss.

SuperM wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

it's

to

it.

kept

to

Once you put a post out there, it's out there, Prongtoi. A post. Get yer befuddled mind together, wouldja?

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:38:06 +0000 (UTC), blu Gave us:

I guess you don't remember where I stated that first.