Constant AC Current Regulator

I got a call from a company who was having problems getting an AC current regulator working. They just needed some basic ideas. I often get such calls and I try to help as long as it doesn't take up too much of my time.

As near as I can tell, they are using the current to test and calibrate current transformers. They needed to route 10 amps of pure 60Hz sine wave AC current through a single heavy wire, as part of a calibration circuit for one of their products. They said the total resistance of the loop was about 0.025 ohms. Their first approach used a small variac and a toroid transformer, to produce the needed current. However, it was not well regulated. The variac approach worked fine, as long as the line voltage remained at 120vac. But since they wanted to keep the 10 amps to an accuracy of +-0.5%, any line voltage change would certainly change the current. They considered attaching the Variac to the output of a ferro-resonant constant 120vac supply or use a motorized Variac but they really wanted something much more compact. They were also concerned about distortion of the 60Hz waveform coming from wall outlet, especially at the waveform peaks. I suggested that perhaps a cleaner 60Hz signal could be synthetically generated and used as a reference. The signal would be fed to an audio amp, which would drive the winding of a low voltage transformer, perhaps 24vac. A custom wound secondary of the transformer could then generate the needed high current. By using another current transformer in line with the test loop, in conjunction with an op amp circuit, the AC current in the loop of wire could be kept constant. Can anyone think of another way this could be done?

David A. Johnson, P.E. --- Consulting Engineer

formatting link
formatting link
Home of the Imagineering on-line magazine. Also,
formatting link
A collection of over 11,000 schematics.

Reply to
dajpe
Loading thread data ...

We do this. We use a homemade sine generator (uP and a DAC) to generate a stable 60 Hz sine, although there are lots of cheap synthesized waveform generators around these days, so I wouldn't go home-brew again. The homemade generator does generate voltage/current waveforms with phase switchable in precise 45 degree steps, which is handy for power testing.

The sig gen drives a 10-turn pot and a power amp, a Peavey 400 watt/channel 2-channel PA amp. We do two channels, one for current and one for voltage, to calibrate electronic power meters. The current channel has the power amp feeding an old radio-station filament transformer rated 5 volts at 190 amps. The secondary loop includes a current shunt to monitor the actual current. Active feedback would be nice, as the current drifts as things warm up so you have to ride herd on the pot. But you can hold 0.1% pretty easily.

We had to change some of the capacitors in the Peavey to reduce phase shift at 50/60 Hz. They kindly sent us a schematic and pointed out which caps caused the most rolloff.

DON'T use anything ferrous in the loop. We used a "brass" rod to slip the CT over, but it was actually plated steel, and it caused massive waveform distortion.

Working off the AC line is nasty, unless you do a bridge-type thing that doesn't care much about the actual drive level. Even then, harmonics and phase shifts will be a nuisance.

Pearson makes superb current sensors, CTs with integral burden resistors, probably better than using a shunt. The Danfysik DCCT's are even better. Expensive.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

In article , wrote: [snip]

Yes, that is the CT test setup we used to supply.

To reduce magnetic fields use a toroidal stimulus transformer. Make sure that the AC amplifier you choose can drive a transformer, or provide external coupling capacitors.

We use two (carefully measured) reference CT's on the loop... one measures the loop current, and the other has it's secondary wired in parallel with the unknown CT, but in antiphase. The resultant current output is the difference between the reference and the unknown. The backing-off CT is a production CT, measured and turns-adjusted to be in the dead centre of the spec. We use traceable instruments for this and usually make about 6-off, for future spares and for routine checking of the working reference CT.

--
Tony Williams.
Reply to
Tony Williams

Neat stuff Tony. Maybe a class D switcher amp would be a good choice here. Great efficiency, power and size. Regards, Harry

Reply to
Harry Dellamano

The trick is in that reference CT on the loop Harry, used for backing-off. It means that the loop current need not be so precise or stable and only one difference measurement to be made. In fact the OP could even consider using the idea on the mains energised setup.

PWM'd audio amplifiers don't seem to be used much for testing wound components. Possible concerns maybe about hf ripple shock-exciting the inductance, and/or possible trouble with hf fuzz affecting the accuracy of AC DVMs.

--
Tony Williams.
Reply to
Tony Williams

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.