Ouch. Fiber will do 0.3 to 0.5dB/km. Can you find a hybrid downhole cable with both wire for powering the device and fiber for the data? I found some hybrid cables here: but without known the details of your application, I can't offer anything specific.
If you don't like a hybrid cable, then there's PoF (power over fiber):
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
S
Syd Rumpo
No, what you get is what they have and use. There /are/ cables with fibre and power conductors, but these are not widely used for long cables as they are thicker and/or weaker.
Cheers
Syd
U
upsidedown
So this is the loss for the whole 10 km cable ?
The thermal noise density at room temperature is -174 dBm/Hz, so at
100 kHz bandwidth the receiver noise power would be -124 dBm, converting that to the transmitter side, the reference level would be
-14 dBm. Add to this the required SNR (depending on modulation method used).
At least due to voltage strength issues, the cable should easily be able to handle a 1 kW (+60 dBm) transmitter power, which would translate to 74 SNR, which should be enough even for 4096QAM so 1 Mbit/s would still be possible. A larger bandwidth and/or lower transmitter power would definitively be possible.
If you need to deliver the transmitter DC power from the opposite end and assuming 2 x 70 ohm loop resistance and 1500 Vdc feed, the short circuit current would be 10 A. At 5 A you could deliver 750 V (3750 W) down the line, which would be more than enough for generating 1000 W RF power.
With more realistic figures, say 200 kHz bandwidth, for which I would expect the loss be 155 dB, the reference level for noise is +34 dBm or
2.5 W (note doubled bandwidth) at the Tx site and assuming a more realistic 100 W (+50 dBm) of transmitter power is used, we are still talking about 16 dB SNR, which should be enough for QPSK (2 bits/symbol) translating to 400 kbit/s.
So if you are now getting 250 kbit/s, you are already quite close to the physical limits.
J
josephkk
at
with
Well you can get very low losses at some frequencies and waveguides not normally referred to as such. How much end point equipment can you deal with?
?-)
S
Syd Rumpo
I think it must be fairly close, as the company who does this are ahead of the rest, and there's money to be made. The transmitter power can't be very high, as packaging constraints mean there's no easy way of getting rid of the heat and the ambient may be 180'C.
Cheers
Syd
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.