8031 question

Yes, Right, I see your problem right away.....

Care to tell *what* your problem really is? Don't you understand the original code? Can't figure out how to produce the same behaviour with a

8031?

I dont understand the original code, if I understand I would't ask this kind a question.

With ASEM -51 ver 1.3 I get this errors:

disp.asm(89): illegal character disp.asm(90): illegal statement syntax disp.asm(91): only allowed in code segment disp.asm(92): illegal statement syntax disp.asm(417): illegal character disp.asm(418): illegal character disp.asm(419): illegal character disp.asm(430): illegal character disp.asm(431): illegal character disp.asm(432): illegal character disp.asm(433): illegal character disp.asm(434): illegal character disp.asm(441): illegal character disp.asm(442): illegal character disp.asm(2161): illegal character disp.asm(2162): illegal character disp.asm(2270): illegal character disp.asm(2304): illegal character disp.asm(2402): illegal character disp.asm(2403): illegal character disp.asm(2505): illegal character disp.asm(2505): illegal character disp.asm(3037): illegal character disp.asm(3079): illegal character

Regards

What do you mean by "translating"?

Do you meant that it won't assemble with some particular assembler you have?

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

50 errors with the Metalink x-assembler. Some similar huge number with PseudoSam TASM -51 reports a divide overflow and exits

People should indicate the assembler in the header, eh?

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

Translate it into WHAT? C, BASIC, FORTH, Pseudo Code, Flowchart, Klingon?

Dave :)

you forgot Lisp, Cobol, Fortran, Pascal, Assembler, Logo, Java, XLMS and what ever else i didn't think of.

--
"I\'m never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5

Algol 68 -- or Ada!

You also forgot about Valgol (the Valley Girl language):

From its modest beginnings in Southern California's San FernandoValley, VALGOL is enjoying a dramatic surge of popularity across the industry.

Here is a sample program: LIKE, Y*KNOW(I MEAN)START IF PIZZA = LIKE BITCHEN AND GUY = LIKE TUBULAR AND VALLEY GIRL = LIKE GRODY**MAX(FERSURE)**2 THEN FOR I = LIKE 1 TO OH*MAYBE 100 DO*WAH - (DITTY**2) BARF(I)=TOTALLY GROSS(OUT) SURE LIKE BAG THIS PROGRAM REALLY LIKE TOTALLY (Y*KNOW) IM*SURE GOTO THE MALL

When the user makes a syntax error, the interpreter displays the message:

GAG ME WITH A SPOON!!

There was an OS for one of the old Tandy computers which allegedly had an error message along the lines of, "Beam me up Scotty, she's sucking mud!"

These are errors in macro definitions and their subsequent invocations. Seems like the macro assembler originaly used has a different macro definition to ASEM-51.

Ian