I'm not sure that works so well. Most LDO's have noise rejection that rolls off somewhere in the 10's to 100's of kHz which is typically below the noise range of the switcher. So they don't really do much at all to clean up switching noise. Much better to minimize the noise in the first place with a proper layout, etc.
Rick
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
rickman
TI used to make a switched cap regulator that was pretty sweet. It was good up to 100 mA or so and regulated the switches like an LDO to maintain a given output voltage. But I don't think they make it anymore.
Rick
T
Tim Williams
Cap multiplier: an emitter follower where the base is supplied by RC-filtered power. Effectively, the capacitance as seen from the emitter is C 1* hFE, which improves HF performance considerably. It also acts as a reversed grounded-base amplifier, so the C-E isolation is large (only Early effect working into the equivalent emitter impedance plus additional bypass).
I recall Phil Hobbs had an application that required two or three stages. Nice part about that is, subsequent stages can be biased from the already-filtered base supply, which means an additional Vbe + Vce(sat) is not incurred, only another Vce(sat).
Tim
-- Deep Friar: a very philos>>
G
George Herold
*
Oh Sorry, the cap multiplier is just a RC and transistor circuit fragment,
formatting link
(R2 is part of the load.) I learned it from Phil H.'s book.... (For years I called it a Hobbs filter.)
George H.
V
Vladimir Vassilevsky
LDOs typically have poor ripple rejection; that's the price for regulator stability. SEPIC needs special good capacitor with low loss and sustaining high current. A transformer flyback is usually better solution.
Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Consultant
formatting link
J
John Larkin
Hey, how about this?
formatting link
The max input is only 4.4, so it would need another diode or something. Too bad.
But a cheap charge-pump doubler and any good regulator would work. You could make your own doubler for about 25 cents worth of parts.
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
P
Phil Hobbs
I picked it up from an audio preamp by Walt Jung, iirc--he had an a cute one that included a LED + emitter follower voltage reference. Would have been about 30 years ago, and the design is much older than that.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
J
John Larkin
Yup. When I was in junior high school I suggested it to a guy who was doing NMR and had too much hum in his electromagnet. I think it was Vernon Cottles.
formatting link
I must have picked it up from one of the electronics mags, PopTronics or the other one.
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
P
panfilero
ke to feed into a LDO regulator to clean it up a bit.... but I'm not sure h ow I can do this since I would have to be consistently above 5V in order fo r the LDO to do its thing.... does anyone know a good way to do this?
I've found a part that appears to reccommend a way of doing what I'm trying to do, but I'm confused...
the part is DCP0105
the datasheet is here
formatting link
on page 16 it starts talking about using an LDO after the 5V to 5V isolator
"It is possible to post regulate the 5VOUT DCP0105 and still guarantee a mi nimum VOUT of 4.75V. This still gives the benefits of isolation in reducing the power supply noise to 5V digital circuitry."
I don't understand what they mean... guarantee Vout of 4.75V? That's terrib le... that's 0.25V away from 5V.... are they talking about something else? I thought adding a post regulator requires a higher votlage than 5V at th e input of the regulator and that the point is to have the 5V LDO provide a nice clean 5V at its output.... will this do that?
thanks!
J
John Larkin
to feed into a LDO regulator to clean it up a bit.... but I'm not sure how I can do this since I would have to be consistently above 5V in order for the LDO to do its thing.... does anyone know a good way to do this?
do, but I'm confused...
minimum VOUT of 4.75V. This still gives the benefits of isolation in reducing the power supply noise to 5V digital circuitry."
terrible... that's 0.25V away from 5V.... are they talking about something else? I thought adding a post regulator requires a higher votlage than 5V at the input of the regulator and that the point is to have the 5V LDO provide a nice clean 5V at its output.... will this do that?
You could buy a little CUI/Murata SIP dc/dc converter, say 5 to 12 volts, and regulate after that. Or get a 5 to 3.3 dc/dc and stack the output on the input to get 8.3, and linear regulate that. The SIPs are cheap and easy to use.
Or make a charge pump booster, cheap in production and more fun.
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
P
panfilero
like to feed into a LDO regulator to clean it up a bit.... but I'm not sur e how I can do this since I would have to be consistently above 5V in order for the LDO to do its thing.... does anyone know a good way to do this?
ing to do, but I'm confused...
tor
minimum VOUT of 4.75V. This still gives the benefits of isolation in reduc ing the power supply noise to 5V digital circuitry."
rible... that's 0.25V away from 5V.... are they talking about something el se? I thought adding a post regulator requires a higher votlage than 5V at the input of the regulator and that the point is to have the 5V LDO provid e a nice clean 5V at its output.... will this do that?
much thanks for all the replies, this is the solution I'm going with, I'm g oing to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
J
John Fields
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:17:26 -0800 (PST), panfilero wrote:
to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 08:33:05 -0600, John Fields wrote:
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
--- If you've got a few gates lying around...
Version 4 SHEET 1 1300 680 WIRE -336 -320 -496 -320 WIRE 160 -320 -336 -320 WIRE -336 -304 -336 -320 WIRE 160 -272 160 -320 WIRE -496 -256 -496 -320 WIRE -336 -224 -336 -240 WIRE -288 -224 -336 -224 WIRE -128 -224 -288 -224 WIRE 16 -224 -128 -224 WIRE -336 -208 -336 -224 WIRE -128 -192 -128 -224 WIRE 16 -192 16 -224 WIRE -496 -128 -496 -176 WIRE -336 -128 -336 -144 WIRE -288 -80 -288 -224 WIRE -240 -80 -288 -80 WIRE -128 -80 -128 -112 WIRE -128 -80 -176 -80 WIRE -112 -80 -128 -80 WIRE -80 -80 -112 -80 WIRE 0 -80 -16 -80 WIRE 16 -80 16 -128 WIRE 16 -80 0 -80 WIRE 64 -80 16 -80 WIRE 160 -80 160 -208 WIRE 160 -80 128 -80 WIRE 192 -80 160 -80 WIRE 288 -80 256 -80 WIRE 368 -80 288 -80 WIRE 416 -80 368 -80 WIRE 736 -80 704 -80 WIRE 800 -80 736 -80 WIRE 928 -80 800 -80 WIRE 928 -48 928 -80 WIRE 288 -32 288 -80 WIRE 800 -32 800 -80 WIRE -112 0 -112 -80 WIRE -80 0 -112 0 WIRE 0 0 0 -80 WIRE 0 0 -16 0 WIRE 368 16 368 -80 WIRE 416 16 368 16 WIRE 736 16 736 -80 WIRE 736 16 704 16 WIRE 800 80 800 32 WIRE 928 80 928 32 WIRE 288 128 288 32 WIRE 560 144 560 80 FLAG -496 -128 0 FLAG -336 -128 0 FLAG 288 128 0 FLAG 928 80 0 FLAG 560 144 0 FLAG 800 80 0 SYMBOL res -112 -96 R180 WINDOW 0 36 76 Left 2 WINDOW 3 36 40 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 10k SYMBOL cap 32 -128 R180 WINDOW 0 24 56 Left 2 WINDOW 3 24 8 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 10n SYMBOL voltage -496 -272 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 2 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 0 10 105 Left 2 SYMATTR Value 4.5 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMBOL schottky -320 -240 R180 WINDOW 0 45 36 Left 2 WINDOW 3 42 8 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value BAT54 SYMATTR Description Diode SYMATTR Type diode SYMBOL cap 128 -96 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 10µ SYMBOL cap 304 32 R180 WINDOW 0 24 56 Left 2 WINDOW 3 24 8 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName C3 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL Digital\\inv -240 -144 R0 WINDOW 3 8 104 Invisible 2 SYMATTR Value Vhigh 5v trise 10n tfall 120n SYMATTR InstName A3 SYMBOL Digital\\inv -80 -144 R0 WINDOW 3 8 104 Invisible 2 SYMATTR Value Vhigh 5v trise 10n tfall 120n SYMATTR InstName A1 SYMBOL schottky -320 -144 R180 WINDOW 0 45 36 Left 2 WINDOW 3 42 8 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value BAT54 SYMATTR Description Diode SYMATTR Type diode SYMBOL schottky 144 -272 R0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value BAT54 SYMATTR Description Diode SYMATTR Type diode SYMBOL schottky 192 -64 R270 WINDOW 0 32 32 VTop 2 WINDOW 3 0 32 VBottom 2 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value BAT54 SYMATTR Description Diode SYMATTR Type diode SYMBOL Digital\\inv -80 -64 R0 WINDOW 3 8 104 Invisible 2 SYMATTR Value Vhigh 5v trise 10n tfall 120n SYMATTR InstName A2 SYMBOL res 944 -64 M0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 220 SYMBOL PowerProducts\\LT3010-5 560 -32 R0 SYMATTR InstName U1 SYMBOL cap 784 -32 R0 SYMATTR InstName C4 SYMATTR Value 1µ TEXT -480 -104 Left 2 !.tran .1 uic
-- JF
J
John Larkin
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
That can be simplified a bit...
formatting link
If there's a clock available, like a spare uP PWM or something, you could use a single HC4053 and a couple of caps to make a charge pump with no diodes.
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
J
John Fields
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
Didn't you forget the cap from the Schmitt input to GND?
J
John Larkin
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
It doesn't really need additional capacitance. That circuit will oscillate fine. The frequency doesn't much matter. The resistor will be ballpark 1M maybe.
a
If it has enough drive, yes.
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
J
Jamie
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
a
You should try a 3 phase version of that going into a single DC node point. It gives a nice DC output.
Jamie
J
John Larkin
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
a
Yeah, like a polyphase buck switcher.
(Which I invented. As did lots of other people.)
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
J
Jamie
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
a
Where I come from, there is only one inventor and many copy cats.
Of course, if you talk to a lawyer, they may have a different view of things.:) Jamie
K
krw
going to end up just boosting up the voltage and then regulating after that
use a
What if the cats didn't copy anyone?
There's a statement!
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.